2010
DOI: 10.1080/07293681003767793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the compact city: capacities and visions for Melbourne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier work (Woodcock et al, 2010), we have shown that projected levels of urban population increase in Melbourne can be accommodated without further horizontal expansion by directing development into activity centres and along transit lines within height limits of four to six storeys. This paper is but a short step in testing two ways of simulating such urban futures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In earlier work (Woodcock et al, 2010), we have shown that projected levels of urban population increase in Melbourne can be accommodated without further horizontal expansion by directing development into activity centres and along transit lines within height limits of four to six storeys. This paper is but a short step in testing two ways of simulating such urban futures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The abstracted envelope images were developed specifically for the research project as part of an exercise modelling the latent intensification capacity of Melbourne's activity centres and primary public transit corridors (Woodcock et al, 2010). An important aspect of this modelling is that the urban form required to achieve an average density is a product of the relationship between limits on height and development take-up rate (the proportion of available land parcels that are intensified).…”
Section: Intensified Streetscape Scenarios and Urban Design Visionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing on an intensive range of interviews and evidence (Dovey, Woodcock, & Wood, 2009b), the authors found that in Melbourne's inner-suburbs, when the term 'character' was raised in urban development debate, the views of stakeholders-the community, developers, politicians, and planners-tended to diverge significantly. Potentially, this could be due to a naïve image of the spatial, social, and economic impacts of urban intensification projects (Woodcock, Dovey, Wollan, & Beyerle, 2010). It remains unclear how residents' experience of their neighbourhoods can be measured and incorporated by planners and decision makers.…”
Section: The Concept Of Neighbourhood Character In Victoria's Planninmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, current planning mechanisms are severely limited in their ability to fully accommodate and consider communities' subjective perceptions of their environment. The basis for engagement and analysis is therefore fundamentally flawed (Woodcock et al, 2010). …”
Section: The Concept Of Neighbourhood Character In Victoria's Planninmentioning
confidence: 99%