2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00651-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the effect of sublethal injury on the distribution of the lag times of individual cells of Lactobacillus plantarum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
51
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A small number of previous studies have sought to examine this phenomenon of the historical impact of stress on individual lag times; furthermore, they have essentially concerned one stress (4,33,34). By using a similar physiological parameter, the loss of cultivability, for each stress, we succeeded in classifying the impacts of nine different stresses on the individual lag time distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small number of previous studies have sought to examine this phenomenon of the historical impact of stress on individual lag times; furthermore, they have essentially concerned one stress (4,33,34). By using a similar physiological parameter, the loss of cultivability, for each stress, we succeeded in classifying the impacts of nine different stresses on the individual lag time distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the individual response was also tackled by some authors such as Baranyi (6), who showed the relationship between the individual lag time distributions and the lag time of the bacterial population. Recently, some individual lag time distributions have been characterized (23,33). The variability of individual lag times seems to be wider as microorganisms are injured (4,33,34,39) or as growth conditions are unfavorable (23,24,27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has indeed been shown that lag times can vary widely between individual cells in a population, and the inherent variability in the lag time of single cells increases with severity of heat treatment (7,15,27,28). Knowing how heat treatments affect the variability of single-cell lag times is extremely important in assessing the risk of cell recovery and growth in processed foods where low numbers of stressed cells of pathogenic bacteria may be distributed among different packs of food.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the lag time of individual cells requires direct microscopic observation [4,8] or techniques to isolate single cells [10]. Cell isolation can be achieved by diluting [2], sorting by flow cytometry [11] or inactivating all organisms except one [9]. When growth is detected in some samples and not in others, it is commonly assumed that growth comes from one cell [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a certain percentage of samples does not show growth, the assumption that growth in the other samples is due to one cell contravenes the predictions of the Poisson distribution. Several researchers have used the Poisson distribution to calculate the proportion of growthpositive samples initially containing more than one cell [5,11,15,16]. McKellar and Hawke [17] recognised that one of the limitations of the Bioscreen as a tool to study single cell behaviour is that it is difficult to ensure that the growth in any given positive well arose from a single cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%