2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aa76fd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the evaporation of nanoparticle suspensions from heterogeneous surfaces

Abstract: We present a Monte Carlo (MC) grid-based model for the drying of drops of a nanoparticle suspension upon a heterogeneous surface. The model consists of a generalised lattice-gas in which the interaction parameters in the Hamiltonian can be varied to model different properties of the materials involved. We show how to choose correctly the interactions, to minimise the effects of the underlying grid so that hemispherical droplets form. We also include the effects of surface roughness to examine the effects of co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bulk liquid diffusion coeficient for a 3D model very similar to that considered here, with dynamics governed by the same KMC algorithm, was determined in Ref. [17]. For temperatures in a similar range to those considered here, they obtained the result that D ≈ 2.6×10 −4 σ 2 KMC steps −1 , where x KMC steps means x attempted moves per lattice site.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficient and Time Scalesmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bulk liquid diffusion coeficient for a 3D model very similar to that considered here, with dynamics governed by the same KMC algorithm, was determined in Ref. [17]. For temperatures in a similar range to those considered here, they obtained the result that D ≈ 2.6×10 −4 σ 2 KMC steps −1 , where x KMC steps means x attempted moves per lattice site.…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficient and Time Scalesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Ref. [17], we can calculate the contact angle by fitting a circle to the location of the liquid-vapour interface, which is defined as the points determined by linear interpolation between pairs of neighbouring lattice sites, where the density ρ = 0.5. Results for the contact angle determined via this method are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Contact Angle and Static Droplet Profiles From Kmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43][44][45][46][47][48] The present DDFT assumes the same Hamiltonian as the MC model in Ref. 48. Thus, the DDFT presented here is able to fully describe any vertical variations in the local densities within the droplet, such as the formation of a nanoparticle 'crust' on the drying droplet, unlike the 2D DDFT models developed previously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, 3dimensional (3D) MC models have subsequently also been developed. [43][44][45][46][47][48] The present DDFT assumes the same Hamiltonian as the MC model in Ref. 48.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common theme in the fields of soft matter and surfacecatalyzed chemical reactions is the crucial role of mesoscopic phase separation: While soft matter deals with topics such as the demixing of lipids in bilayer membranes [1] and of polymers or nanoparticles in a melt or solution [2][3][4][5][6][7], surface catalysis relies on the structure of coexisting lowand high-density fluid domains of reactants adsorbed at a metal surface [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In this Letter, we theoretically explore under what conditions phenomenological models fail to describe phase separation in the context of surface catalysis, and discuss the implications of this failure on the morphology formation in solvent-cast thin-film polymer composites [16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%