2005
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the hydrology of a catchment using a distributed and a semi‐distributed model

Abstract: Abstract:Various hydrological models exist that describe the phases in the hydrologic cycle either in an empirical, semimechanistic or fully mechanistic way. The way and level of detail for the different processes of the hydrologic cycle that needs to be described depends on the objective, the application and the availability of data. In this study the performance of two different models, the fully distributed MIKE SHE model and the semi-distributed SWAT model, was assessed. The aim of the comparative study wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HIMS model provides multiple choices describing each of the water cycling processes, accounts for the combined runoff generation mechanisms, and adds a runoff generation model like LCM [19,20] as well as a newly explored solving method of channel routing model [23,24]. Even though the existing models like the MIKE-SHE [37][38][39] and HEC-HMS [40,41] modularize the water cycling processes and technologies like the open modeling interface (OpenMI) technology [42][43][44][45] provide an environment of integrating the hydrological modules, the advantages of HIMS are not covered. Besides the characteristic of flexible structure, the HIMS model is suitable for un-gauged areas and areas of various channel routing scenarios with the friendly user interface and theoretically improved runoff generation and concentration models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HIMS model provides multiple choices describing each of the water cycling processes, accounts for the combined runoff generation mechanisms, and adds a runoff generation model like LCM [19,20] as well as a newly explored solving method of channel routing model [23,24]. Even though the existing models like the MIKE-SHE [37][38][39] and HEC-HMS [40,41] modularize the water cycling processes and technologies like the open modeling interface (OpenMI) technology [42][43][44][45] provide an environment of integrating the hydrological modules, the advantages of HIMS are not covered. Besides the characteristic of flexible structure, the HIMS model is suitable for un-gauged areas and areas of various channel routing scenarios with the friendly user interface and theoretically improved runoff generation and concentration models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These watershed models are increasingly used to assess alternative strategies for improved water resources management [77,78]. However, manipulating model parameters during calibration is a challenge [79] because of overparametrization of hydrologic models [80]. Taking into account various sources of uncertainty is therefore an essential and integrated part of hydrological modeling for reliable predictions of streamflow and sediment yield.…”
Section: Model Prediction Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closer the values of RMSE and ABSERR to zero, and R 2 to unity, the better the model performance is evaluated (Abu El-Nasr et al, 2005). Percent bias (PBIAS) measures the average tendency, expressed as a percentage of the simulated data to be larger or smaller than their observed counterparts (Gupta et al, 1999).…”
Section: Models Performance Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%