2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the metabolic shift of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is significant because only six of the treatment works they screened were configured for EBPR, suggesting that the potential for effective EPBR is more driven by local environmental conditions than by specific "engineered" microbial communities. Carvalheira et al (2014) and Acevedo et al (2014) support this by showing PAO adapt their metabolic processes to optimize substrate utilization, making them more resilient than previously believed.…”
Section: Traditional Ebpr Systems and Recent Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is significant because only six of the treatment works they screened were configured for EBPR, suggesting that the potential for effective EPBR is more driven by local environmental conditions than by specific "engineered" microbial communities. Carvalheira et al (2014) and Acevedo et al (2014) support this by showing PAO adapt their metabolic processes to optimize substrate utilization, making them more resilient than previously believed.…”
Section: Traditional Ebpr Systems and Recent Enhancementsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…and it has since been shown that PAO are capable of utilizing both the TCA cycle and Glycolysis (Zhou et al, 2009). Some have suggested that some PAO may switch between metabolic pathways according to internal or external conditions (Acevedo et al, 2012(Acevedo et al, , 2014Majed et al, 2012;Lanham et al, 2013). Utilisation of glycolysis has been shown to yield more efficient P-removal rates than the TCA cycle, within the context of an enhanced CAS system (Lanham et al, 2013).…”
Section: Metabolism Of Paomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the input space was sampled to conform to the assumptions of the metabolic model, i.e., within a narrow range of temperatures, pH and an influent mixture of HAc and HPr, the predictions may not be valid in situations where the PAO population is subject to limiting conditions for extended periods of time. For instance, PAO have been found to shift from PHA to glycogen accumulation in anaerobic conditions following a lack of PO 4 in the influent (Acevedo et al, 2014, 2017)—a phenotypic behavior characteristic of their GAO competitors. Similarly, PAO have been shown to employ the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle to supplement the production of reducing agents to cope with a lack of VFA in the influent, or due to glycogen depletion, possibly as a result of prolonged periods of cellular maintenance (Lanham et al, 2013, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the application of advanced molecular techniques has led to a more comprehensive understanding of both the metabolic activity and phylogenetic diversity (Oehmen et al, 2007), e.g., differing capacities of PAO clades for denitrification (Zeng et al, 2003a; Flowers et al, 2009; Oehmen et al, 2010b), utilization of the TCA cycle to supply reducing power for PHA formation (Lanham et al, 2014) or shift to glycolysis-driven VFA uptake (Acevedo et al, 2014). Consequently, the complexity of metabolic models, in terms of stoichiometric and kinetic descriptions of the underlying processes, as well as the number of different organisms to account for, has been on the rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bacterial population plays a very important part of the WWT community since they remove most of the BOD by metabolizing or degrading the organic matter. Furthermore, In particular, some bacteria are polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAO) (Acevedo et al, 2014) responsible for most of the phosphate removal, and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) that remove ammonia that is toxic to biota downstream ( Zhang et al, 2011). These groups remove contaminants in different ways, PAOs are responsible for removing phosphate by physically storing them in their cells (T. Zhang et al, 2011), while ammonia is removed chemically by AOBs and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOBs) in a two-step process (Acevedo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Communities (Wwtcs)mentioning
confidence: 99%