2014
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.880381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the NOM uptake by anion exchange resins in drinking water plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the removal of hydrophobics fraction can be explained by physical adsorption. It was also stated by Pürschel et al [ 52 ] that polystyrene resin provides a better organic removal and removes hydrophobic neutral fraction through π–π bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, the removal of hydrophobics fraction can be explained by physical adsorption. It was also stated by Pürschel et al [ 52 ] that polystyrene resin provides a better organic removal and removes hydrophobic neutral fraction through π–π bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Purschel states that possible removal mechanisms of starch molecules, representatives for the polysaccharide BP, from a synthetic water at neutral and acidic pH by strong base AER (SBA) are ion-dipole and/or van der Waals interactions. In the case of 2-naphtol, a model compound for hydrophobic LMWN, the researchers point out π-π stacking and/or hydrophobic interactions as additional removal mechanisms [31]. In the work of Finkbeiner et al, hydrophobic effects and π − π stacking were proposed as main removal mechanisms for resorcinol, also a surrogate for hydrophobic LMWN, from a synthetic water at neutral pH, where the strongest interaction was found for styrenic resins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%