2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2008.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the processes of cliff-top erosion and deposition under extreme storm waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
89
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent paper, Goff et al (2010) examined the physics of the boulder transport and concluded that the suspension is unrealistic, whereas the entrainment and/or the saltation are more probable. These types of transport were directly surveyed by Mastronuzzi and Sansò (2004) for boulders moved by a four day stormhundred-thousand of waves-occurred in Adriatic Sea on January 2003 or hypothesized by Hall et al (2006Hall et al ( , 2008 and by Hansom et al (2008) for the terrible storms impacting on the high British cliffs facing on the North Sea. Despite the conclusions reached by Goff et al (2010), the general features of the boulders, the absence of significant smaller fragments, the presence of a delicate and continuous band of algal rim and of sparse bio-concretions, all together seem to suggest a transport characterised by a single movement, eluding the possibility that boulders could have been rounded by the abrasion on the surf bench.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent paper, Goff et al (2010) examined the physics of the boulder transport and concluded that the suspension is unrealistic, whereas the entrainment and/or the saltation are more probable. These types of transport were directly surveyed by Mastronuzzi and Sansò (2004) for boulders moved by a four day stormhundred-thousand of waves-occurred in Adriatic Sea on January 2003 or hypothesized by Hall et al (2006Hall et al ( , 2008 and by Hansom et al (2008) for the terrible storms impacting on the high British cliffs facing on the North Sea. Despite the conclusions reached by Goff et al (2010), the general features of the boulders, the absence of significant smaller fragments, the presence of a delicate and continuous band of algal rim and of sparse bio-concretions, all together seem to suggest a transport characterised by a single movement, eluding the possibility that boulders could have been rounded by the abrasion on the surf bench.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the boulder accumulation process, is the impacting wave height more important compared to the wave length and to the wave period? Different theories have been proposed in the recent time, but the final reply is still far away (Nott, 2003;Goto et al, 2007Goto et al, , 2009bGoto et al, , 2010bHansom et al, 2008;Imamura et al, 2008;Pignatelli et al, 2009;Barbano et al, 2010). The more easy reply is that if a wave can be described by height, length and period, the best way to evaluate its impact on a rocky coast should consider these parameters all together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these flow velocities would have caused rolling transport of ESA 9, ambiguities remain for the joint-bounded boulder scenario, which tends towards significant overestimation (Switzer and Burston, 2010;Etienne, 2012). Discrepancies may for instance be related to the overestimation of strain forces between the block and the strongly karstified reef body, or to the underestimation of the waves' impact and lift forces approaching the cliffs and their associated jets (Hansom et al, 2008). However, flow velocities of 8.2 m s −1 are required for the subsequent rolling transport of ESA 5, which is in agreement with the flow velocities inferred from ESA 7 and 9.…”
Section: Boulder Transport and Flow Velocities Inferred By Inverse Momentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, research attention has shifted its focus to the role of impacting wave height compared to the wave length and to the wave period. Different theories have been proposed (Goto et al, 2007(Goto et al, , 2009(Goto et al, , 2010Hansom et al, 2008;Imamura et al, 2008;Pignatelli et al, 2009;Nandasena et al, 2011), suggesting that in order to evaluate the wave impact on a rocky coast, these parameters should be considered all together.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%