2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8809(02)00217-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
116
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding farms are considered the basic unit of analysis in agriculture, modeling agricultural and natural systems usually requires integrating farm-scale actions with regional-scale approaches (Henseler et al, 2009;Rounsevell et al, 2003). Gómez-Limón and Riesgo (2004) indicates that when decisions are based on the same decision-making criteria (e.g.…”
Section: The Economic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding farms are considered the basic unit of analysis in agriculture, modeling agricultural and natural systems usually requires integrating farm-scale actions with regional-scale approaches (Henseler et al, 2009;Rounsevell et al, 2003). Gómez-Limón and Riesgo (2004) indicates that when decisions are based on the same decision-making criteria (e.g.…”
Section: The Economic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some researchers thought that finalizing dominant economic options should consider ecosystem sustainability and social issues (Pfaff and Sanchez, 2004) some others believe that the economic development of many communities is based on proper land use planning with economic respects (Pasour, 1983). The use of different optimization methods have been developed whereby most immersive and reasonable management actions associated with them so that spatial distribution of agricultural land in order to maximize profits modeled (Rounsevell et al, 2003). Both linear and nonlinear programming to optimize and achieve higher profits of land also used (Benli and Kodal, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expect, however, that categorical land-use change, such as the conversion from arable farming to livestock farming or from farming to nature conservation, will arise also from land exchange from one agent type to another. This is because a categorical change often requires considerable investment in knowledge and equipment for most land owners (Rounsevell et al 2003), while it may also lead to undesired social effects such as an alienation from one's network of peers (Karali et al 2013a, b), which have been shown to strongly influence the willingness to change (Lokhorst et al 2010(Lokhorst et al , 2011. This is supported by data from the Dutch Agricultural Economics Institute, which demonstrate that-over a time span of 10 years-farms that undergo a categorical land-use change (e.g., from dairy farming to arable farming) cover about 4 % of the total agricultural area, while parcels that undergo such a change (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%