Modelo de innovación socio-institucional en la administración pública

Sanagustín, Maria Victoria; Icart, Ignasi Brunet

doi:10.17345/rio19.93-116

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First and foremost, relations with public administrations should be based on transparency and trust [29]; they should be directed towards providing essential support to micro-enterprises so that they get to be implemented. A study conducted by Ramírez et al [30] in Mexico showed that when the government generates support structures by investing, funding, and training in this type of business, the results, even in cases of extreme vulnerability, are overwhelmingly positive.…”

Section: The Role Of Public Institutions In Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…From these statements, one can observe the lack of confidence in relations with public administrations, especially when it comes to providing entrepreneurs in this sector with the essential and necessary support for collaboration and coworking among themselves, as Sanagustín-Fons and Brunet-Icart [29] indicated.…”

Section: Promotion and Governmental Support For Collaboration Between Ecological Companies In The Agro-livestock Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After examining the above statements, the absence of government support is corroborated by: (a) The aforementioned "institutional inertia" when faced with applying strategies that, far from favoring, worsen the environmental and socioeconomic problems of traditional agricultural techniques such as the Mayan milpa in the rural sector [45]; and (b) insufficient transparency in informing producers about possible aid for their agroecological ventures [29].…”

Section: Entrepreneurs' Self-evaluation Of Their Agroecological Entrepreneurial Training and The Areas In Which They Detect Greatest Traimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These considerations are also an important generator of either obstacles to or support for organic production and consumption, since it is understood that bureaucratic obstacles hinder the creation and development of companies in this sector. Here, we are referring to the transparency and trust that public administrations should demonstrate in order to provide a solid support that generates dynamism in the processes of entrepreneurship [29], while at the same time generating support through funding and training mechanisms [30]. In this regard, entrepreneurs highlight these obstacles: I4: "There are obstacles: you need contacts in the government to get that financial facility or to get that loan; not just anyone gets that chance .…”

Section: Existence Of Bureaucratic Obstacles To the Agroecological Enterprisementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Agroecological Entrepreneurship, Public Support, and Sustainable Development: The Case of Rural Yucatan (Mexico)

Gregory

López-Canto

Fons

et al. 2020

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper offers an approach to Yucatecan social reality in terms of entrepreneurship and the process of creating companies dedicated to the production and/or commercialization of agroecological products, considering its contribution to sustainable rural development. The key actors’ perspective towards the existence of policies that favor land sustainability, assist in the development of rural areas and their population, and support these business initiatives is also presented. Likewise, it illustrates the small entrepreneurs’ standpoint on the role of public institutions in promoting wealth generation and sustainable development in lower growth areas, such as the state of Yucatan, in Mexico. A qualitative methodology was used for this research, based on in-depth interviews with a group of businessmen and -women from the region. The main results give a pessimistic view of institutional concern regarding both production and consumption of agroecological products and, therefore, the promotion of these enterprises for the socioeconomic development of Yucatan. From these findings, we detect: (a) A policy of scarce support for this type of production, due to political priorities; (b) inadequate management that prevents the consolidation of certain structures needed to support agroecological enterprises; (c) a lack of confidence in the Yucatecan government, which does not promote or support a social network of collaboration between agroecological producers and marketers; (d) a difficulty in undertaking agroecological enterprises because of social and cultural norms and poor environmental awareness among the population; (e) significant training deficiencies among entrepreneurs in agroecological agriculture; (f) absence of adequate distribution channels for agroecological products; and (g) excessive bureaucratic obstacles through laws that hinder entrepreneurial processes.

show abstract

Section: The Role Of Public Institutions In Entrepreneurshipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Promotion and Governmental Support For Collaboration Between Ecological Companies In The Agro-livestock Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Entrepreneurs' Self-evaluation Of Their Agroecological Entrepreneurial Training and The Areas In Which They Detect Greatest Traimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Existence Of Bureaucratic Obstacles To the Agroecological Enterprisementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Agroecological Entrepreneurship, Public Support, and Sustainable Development: The Case of Rural Yucatan (Mexico)

Gregory

López-Canto

Fons

et al. 2020

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

El uso de la IA como herramienta para la investigación académica: políticas editoriales y condicionantes éticos en el camino hacia su normalización

Cámara Molina

2024

DERE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En pocos años, la inteligencia artifical (en adelante IA) ha experimentado un salto cualitativo como tecnología al alcance de todas las personas, con un potencial ilimitado para incrementar la productividad. Debido a su rápida expansión, hoy día puede considerarse una herramienta habitual en multitud de actividades, incluyendo el entorno académico, tanto en su vertiente de enseñanza como en la investigación, y así debe entenderse por su condición de software de código abierto. Sin embargo, conviene identificar y tener presentes los riesgos derivados de su uso para evitar que se materialicen. Del estudio de las normas de publicación de 32 editoriales reunidas en torno a STM Integrity Hub, la comisión de integridad de STM, se desprende un reconocimiento de las posibilidades que ofrece la IA en la elaboración de artículos científicos, siempre que se emplee como herramienta, no como coautora, y reclaman un uso responsable, bajo criterios éticos. Por fin, se compendian algunas buenas prácticas para el correcto uso de IA en la literatura académica. Estas normas evolucionarán, previsiblemente, a medida que avance el conocimiento y la experiencia empírica en la materia. Se concluye que la cooperación entre las editoriales académicas, en busca de criterios universalizables, resulta esencial para evitar riesgos.

show abstract

Modelo de innovación socio-institucional en la administración pública

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Agroecological Entrepreneurship, Public Support, and Sustainable Development: The Case of Rural Yucatan (Mexico)

Agroecological Entrepreneurship, Public Support, and Sustainable Development: The Case of Rural Yucatan (Mexico)

El uso de la IA como herramienta para la investigación académica: políticas editoriales y condicionantes éticos en el camino hacia su normalización

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About