Models for oral uptake of nanoparticles in consumer products

Abstract

Presently, many consumer products contain nano-sized materials (NMs) to improve material properties, product quality and ease of use. NMs in food additives and in cosmetic articles (e.g., tooth paste) may be taken up by the oral route. As adverse effects of environmental nanoparticles, like ultrafine particles, have been reported, consumers worry about potential risks when using products containing NMs. The review focuses on metal and metal oxide NMs as common additives in tooth paste and in food industry and exposure by the oral route. Testing of NMs for oral exposure is very complex because differences in the diet, in mucus secretion and composition, in pH, in gastrointestinal transit time and in gastrointestinal flora influence NM uptake. Acellular (mucus, saliva) and epithelial layer of the orogastrointestinal barrier are described. Expected exposure doses, interaction of the NMs with mucus and permeation through the epithelium as well as in vivo data are mentioned. The role of in vitro models for the study of parameters relevant for ingested NMs is discussed.

Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles

“…8 Nanoparticle dimensions influence their GIT fate and toxicity through a number of mechanisms. 6,105,106 First, smaller nanoparticles are usually dissolved or digested more rapidly in GIT fluids than larger ones with similar compositions. Second, the ability of GIT components (such as digestive enzymes, phospholipids, bile salts, or mineral ions) to interact with nanoparticles is likely to increase as their size decreases because of the increase in surface area.…”

A 3D co-culture of three human cell lines to model the inflamed intestinal mucosa for safety testing of nanomaterials

“…A number of studies have described Ag nanoparticles as being able to induce toxicity in different species and uptake from the intestine has been reported in animal models (Beer et al, 2012;Loeschner et al, 2011). TiO 2 nanoparticles are present in many foods, especially sweets like candies and marshmallows (Weir, 2012) and as whitener in toothpaste; Au NPs may also be included in packaging (Frohlich & Roblegg, 2012), but nanomedicines/diagnostics and nanoelectronics are more likely routes of exposure. The toxic potential and uptake pathway of Au NPs are still unclear (Mironava et al, 2010).…”

CARMEN : une plateforme de caractérisation métrologique dédiée aux nanomatériaux

“…Des études sur des nanoparticules de latex chargées positivement montrent qu'elles sont piégées dans le mucus épithélial chargé négativement, alors que les nanoparticules électronégatives le traversent et peuvent être captées par les entérocytes (cellules de l'épithélium intestinal, au sein de la muqueuse intestinale) [29]. L'état de charge en surface des nano-objets peut donc être un facteur pertinent des études toxicologiques.…”