Functional Food - Improve Health Through Adequate Food 2017
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.69174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Models to Evaluate the Prebiotic Potential of Foods

Abstract: The interest in studying the prebiotic effect of foods is increasing due to the way in which the consumption of these foods influences the gut microbiota and how the metabolic activity of the microbiota affects the health and well-being of the host. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have been developed to elucidate the prebiotic effect of foods, and particularly in in vivo studies, the physiological dynamics of this effect has been studied in healthy or diseased individuals. In this chapter, the main in vit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been difficult to assess and measure the global consumption of prebiotics since they are found in varied food groups from natural sources, viz., vegetables, fruits, milk, and honey, to wide ranges of supplements (de Souza Aquino et al, 2017;Carlson et al, 2018). The prebiotics from natural sources include resistant starch, GOS, FOS, XOS, POS, and other oligosaccharides (de Souza Aquino et al, 2017). Without the inclusive list of food ingredients on the food package, epidemiologic tracking of prebiotic consumption pattern is difficult to ascertain (Carlson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction To Prebiotics and Its Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been difficult to assess and measure the global consumption of prebiotics since they are found in varied food groups from natural sources, viz., vegetables, fruits, milk, and honey, to wide ranges of supplements (de Souza Aquino et al, 2017;Carlson et al, 2018). The prebiotics from natural sources include resistant starch, GOS, FOS, XOS, POS, and other oligosaccharides (de Souza Aquino et al, 2017). Without the inclusive list of food ingredients on the food package, epidemiologic tracking of prebiotic consumption pattern is difficult to ascertain (Carlson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction To Prebiotics and Its Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain gut health, most prebiotics require an average oral dose of 3-5 g/day. However, daily dose recommendations depend on the nature of the food containing a prebiotic compound whether it is naturally present or specifically added (de Souza Aquino et al, 2017). Scientific evidence indicates that the consumption of inulin (5-8 g/day), FOS (3 g/day), and GOS (4 g/day) led to a significant increase in fecal probiotic bifidobacteria (de Souza Aquino et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introduction To Prebiotics and Its Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates, proteins, and other fibers in the large intestine produces beneficial as well as nonbeneficial compounds that could affect the bowel health. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) such as acetic, propionic, and butyric are some of them which may confer various health benefits to human beings (Aquino et al, 2017;Rowland et al, 2018). Probiotic bacterial species, mainly Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, are responsible for the production of these short-chain fatty acids, mostly due to the fermentation of dietary oligosaccharides (Fernando et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probiotic bacterial species, mainly Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, are responsible for the production of these short-chain fatty acids, mostly due to the fermentation of dietary oligosaccharides (Fernando et al, 2010). Furthermore, the fermentation process by beneficial microorganisms is vital in reducing the population of pathogenic microorganisms in the gut due to the significant reduction of colonic pH (Aquino et al, 2017;Campbell et al, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%