2016
DOI: 10.17116/repro201622561-69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern approaches to endometrial receptivity assessment (a review)

Abstract: Согласно существующим представлениям, все причины безуспешности попыток ЭКО, в которых удается выполнить перенос полученных in vitro эм-брионов, могут быть связаны либо с их неспособно-стью к внутриматочной нидации (эмбриональный фактор), либо со снижением рецептивности эндоме-трия (эндометриальный фактор) [1,2]. Необходи-мость совершенствования эндометриального факто-ра программ ЭКО определяется тем, что при исполь-зовании морфологически хороших эмбрионов, по-лученных при оплодотворении донорских ооцитов в пр… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implantation process consists of three main components: hormonal environment, a healthy embryo that should have the ability to implant, and a receptive endometrium. Any abnormality attributed to one of these components may result in unsuccessful IVF attempts [2][3][4]. It is known that the transfer of an embryo without genetic abnormalities after preimplantation genetic screening in many cases does not result a successful pregnancy, which may be due to alteration of endometrial receptivity (ER) or hormonal stimulation [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implantation process consists of three main components: hormonal environment, a healthy embryo that should have the ability to implant, and a receptive endometrium. Any abnormality attributed to one of these components may result in unsuccessful IVF attempts [2][3][4]. It is known that the transfer of an embryo without genetic abnormalities after preimplantation genetic screening in many cases does not result a successful pregnancy, which may be due to alteration of endometrial receptivity (ER) or hormonal stimulation [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most promising additional methods for diagnosing CE is hysteroscopy [6,16,32,34,65,71], especially in cases of diagnostic uncertainties [70,72,73]. Through visual evaluation of the entire endometrial surface, hysteroscopy can enable the identifi cation of specifi c endometrial changes that are consistent with severe forms (e.g., micropolyps) [73,74].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of theories are available to explain the CE-related reduction in the implantation capacity of the endometrium [15][16][17][18][19][20] -activation of local infl ammatory processes with altered secretion of cytokines and chemokines [19,[21][22][23][24][25]; abnormal leukocytic infi ltration, decidualization, and vascularization in the uterine cavity mucosa [13,19,23,24,26,27,29,30]; altered uterine contractility [16,28]. Although these theories clearly refl ect some features of CE pathogenesis, the current evidence for a correlation between this pathology and implantation defects is often based on data from studies that are not without their limitations, such as heterogeneous sampling and questionable diagnostic criteria for CE [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%