2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43871-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Neural Methods for Function Approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of how spatial data are used, our goal is to approximate f from data so that it can be iterated forward to make predictions. There is a vast literature on function approximation techniques (Iatan, 2016; Judd, 1999; Stalph, 2014), but the most commonly used in ecological EDM are piece‐wise constant models (e.g. Simplex, Sugihara & May, 1990), local linear regression (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of how spatial data are used, our goal is to approximate f from data so that it can be iterated forward to make predictions. There is a vast literature on function approximation techniques (Iatan, 2016; Judd, 1999; Stalph, 2014), but the most commonly used in ecological EDM are piece‐wise constant models (e.g. Simplex, Sugihara & May, 1990), local linear regression (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%