Inorganic Plant Nutrition 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-68885-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern Solution Culture Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on studies in flowing nutrient solutions with constant external concentrations, between 0.25 and 3.6 ~ Mn2+ is considered adequate for the growth of most plant species (2). In a more recent report (1) these required concentrations (denoted as 'rhizosphere Mn concentrations') appear to vary between 0.01 and 50.0 ~ Mn, reflecting differences between plant species.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Mn Requiredfor Adequate Growthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on studies in flowing nutrient solutions with constant external concentrations, between 0.25 and 3.6 ~ Mn2+ is considered adequate for the growth of most plant species (2). In a more recent report (1) these required concentrations (denoted as 'rhizosphere Mn concentrations') appear to vary between 0.01 and 50.0 ~ Mn, reflecting differences between plant species.…”
Section: Concentrations Of Mn Requiredfor Adequate Growthmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is comparable to recent reported yields of Gnome soybeans grown under field conditions (0.39 kg m-2, 16.4 g per 100 seeds, Smiciklas et a1 1992). Historically, when plant scientists have used hydroponic culture techniques, nutrient solutions have been replaced frequently to prevent deficiencies of individual ions (Imsande and Ralston 1981;Asher and Edwards 1983). The expense of the nitrogen isotope in the present study dictated a recirculation of the nutrient solution.…”
Section: Nutrient Solution Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two possibilities that could account for this observed change in Mn accumulation rate. Firstly, it is possible that in barley, the minimum nutrient concentration (Cmin) from which plants can accumulate a particular nutrient (see reviews by Asher, 1981;Asher and Edwards, 1983) such as Mn, changed with developmental age of plants; or secondly, these plants were affected by the absence of Mn for the first week of growth and the subsequent accumulation rate responded to some homeostatic mechanism which increased this rate by a manner similar in concept to those already shown for P and Fe R6mheld and Marschner, 1986). The latter seems unlikely as a Mn-specific response to the absence of Mn, because the effect of plant age on accumulation rate was common to other nutrient cations.…”
Section: Accumulation Rate Of Mnmentioning
confidence: 99%