2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2233887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modern technologies of fabrication and testing of large convex secondary mirrors

Abstract: Modern large telescopes such as TAO, LSST, TMT and EELT require 0.9m-4m monolithic convex secondary mirrors. The fabrication and testing of these large convex secondary mirrors of astronomical telescopes is getting challenging as the aperture of the mirror is getting bigger. The biggest challenge to fabricate these large convex aspheric mirrors is to measure the surface figure to a few nanometers, while maintaining the testing and fabrication cycle to be efficient to minimize the downtime. For the last a coupl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate and precise positioning of the sub-aperture metrology unit within the global coordinate frame is essential to adjust and compensate for the motion and tolerance of the metrology system. A custom-designed and -built sub-aperture interferometric stitching system [126] to test a convex aspheric mirror ∼1 m in diameter is shown in figure 23. In this configuration, the CGH was designed to compensate for the majority of the common aspheric wavefront departures, considering all the sub-apertures.…”
Section: Sub-aperture Stitching Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate and precise positioning of the sub-aperture metrology unit within the global coordinate frame is essential to adjust and compensate for the motion and tolerance of the metrology system. A custom-designed and -built sub-aperture interferometric stitching system [126] to test a convex aspheric mirror ∼1 m in diameter is shown in figure 23. In this configuration, the CGH was designed to compensate for the majority of the common aspheric wavefront departures, considering all the sub-apertures.…”
Section: Sub-aperture Stitching Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test is good for simple surfaces, but as the aspheric departure grows, a full aperture null becomes much less practical. Therefore, the subaperture stitching interferometry or swing-arm profilometry are becoming the most attractive options when testing modern convex secondaries [168]. When utilizing sub-aperture stitching interferometry, new data processing methods to ensure accurate data across the full aperture have been developed.…”
Section: 4a Null Testing Of Concave Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%