Modernization and reform of Dutch waterboards: resilience or change?

Abstract

In this article, we look into the question whether the Dutch waterboards can still be considered resilient institutions, effectively adapting to changing circumstances as often described in literature. We argue that current waterboards resemble the CPR management form of old only in name. Their institutional nature has changed considerably, thus providing a challenge to the future of CPR water management in the Netherlands. We examine not only the implications for the institutional performance and future of the waterboard system but also discuss possible ways to regenerate the system. With respect to the latter (changes in), the system of governance and community base character of waterboards are examined.

Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities

“…However, as democratic organizations, they have considerable freedom in defining how to reach those goals, which is laid down in obligatory six-year strategic plans. They are often portrayed as inward looking and technocratic (Toonen, Dijkstra, and van der Meer 2006). However, in recent years they have been become more open and responsive to society (Edelenbos and van Meerkerk 2015), and have increasingly engaged in innovation of all sorts, from technical innovations like fully automated water level control to co-designing rainwater storage solutions with citizens to improve their neighbourhoods (Unie van Waterschappen 2011; Unie van Waterschappen and Rijkswaterstaat 2016).…”

Cost-Benefit Analysis for Flood Risk Management and Water Governance in the Netherlands: An Overview of One Century

“…Common pool problems can not only be resolved by a purely private solution by assigning individual property rights or by a purely collective solution by the government taking over the management, but also by management as a group with joined responsibilities. Water and water management in the Netherlands may be considered as 'commons' in more than one way (see Toonen et al, 2006). Commons consists of natural (water, fisheries, and nature areas) or cultural and man-made resources (dykes, polders, irrigation systems).…”

Cross-sector collaboration within Dutch flood risk governance: historical analysis of external triggers

“…For example, with the adoption of the First Water Policy Document (1968), together with the Surface Water Pollution Act, the focus has extended from water quantity, safety and sanitation to include issues of water quality (Kuks, 2002). Moreover, in line with the increasing complexity of the Dutch water regime, since the 1970s post-materialistic landscape, environmental and cultural values gained significance in Dutch society and consequently in water management policies (Toonen, Dijkstra, & Van Der Meer, 2006). The construction of Delta works and reinforcement of the river dikes after the flooding of 1953 met growing resistance from the public concerned with the impact on the environment and landscape.…”