2012
DOI: 10.1177/0096340212459038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modernization of nuclear weapons: Aspiring to “indefinite retention”?

Abstract: Currently, all nations with nuclear weapons are modernizing their arsenals, delivery systems, and related infrastructure. These programs have serious implications for nuclear disarmament. By investing in the extension, upgrading, and reinforcement of their arsenals and capacities, the author writes, these governments are investing in the future of nuclear weapons, not in the future of disarmament. Other non-nuclear states have expressed concern with these programs and are using international venues, including … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nuclear powers of course have not achieved disarmament and are, on the contrary, pursuing modernization of their arsenals (Acheson, 2012). If France continued on this nuclear military path as it was shuttering its own nuclear power industry, the future of Areva itself could come into question.…”
Section: Human Security and The Nuclear Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nuclear powers of course have not achieved disarmament and are, on the contrary, pursuing modernization of their arsenals (Acheson, 2012). If France continued on this nuclear military path as it was shuttering its own nuclear power industry, the future of Areva itself could come into question.…”
Section: Human Security and The Nuclear Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actors are unlikely to relinquish their major sources of status and prestige. Despite a regularity in quantitative disarmament, the role of nuclear weapons has not decreased, which indicates plans for retention (Acheson, 2012). Tackling the underlying reasons States are drawn to maintaining nuclear weapons -such as their status symbolismmight pave the way for more successful disarmament efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%