2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modification of Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Non-Penetrating Deep Sclerectomy

Abstract: Changes in the cornea can influence outcomes in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). We aimed to evaluate the relevance of changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients undergoing non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with the Esnoper V2000 implant® (AJL Ophthalmic S.A., Gasteiz, Spain). We included 42 eyes of 42 patients with POAG scheduled for NPDS with the Esnoper V2000 implant. Biomechanical properties were measured by Ocular Response Analyzer® G3 (ORA; Reichert … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found a significant difference between the two groups in various analyzed parameters, results indicating that ORA could be useful in postoperative glaucoma diagnostics. Moreover, Diaz-Barreda et al [15] reported significant modifications in corneal biomechanical parameters measured with ORA in patients that underwent a deep sclerectomy with Esnoper V2000 implant. Corneal hysteresis remained above preoperative values at 3 months of follow-up, whereas corneal resistance factor was at a lower level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found a significant difference between the two groups in various analyzed parameters, results indicating that ORA could be useful in postoperative glaucoma diagnostics. Moreover, Diaz-Barreda et al [15] reported significant modifications in corneal biomechanical parameters measured with ORA in patients that underwent a deep sclerectomy with Esnoper V2000 implant. Corneal hysteresis remained above preoperative values at 3 months of follow-up, whereas corneal resistance factor was at a lower level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low corneal hysteresis is used to diagnose glaucoma and monitor the progression of optic nerve damage. [274][275][276][277] Additionally, the study of changes in corneal stiffness during corneal wound healing in vivo is an unexplored area of corneal research. An alternative to corneal hysteresis is atomic force microscopy to measure changes in intracellular stiffness in vitro and extracellular matrix stiffness in vivo.…”
Section: Dissertation Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%