2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01971-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified ablation index: a novel determinant of a successful first-pass left atrial posterior wall isolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 A recent study suggested a modified AI ≥ 199 au/mV (AI/bipolar voltage along the ablation line) for successful left atrial posterior wall isolation. 22 In our study, AI ≥ 500 for the anterior and roof segments and AI ≥ 400 for posterior, carina, and inferior segments reduced the acute PV reconnection in those with LAWT grade ≥3 (≥1.5 mm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 A recent study suggested a modified AI ≥ 199 au/mV (AI/bipolar voltage along the ablation line) for successful left atrial posterior wall isolation. 22 In our study, AI ≥ 500 for the anterior and roof segments and AI ≥ 400 for posterior, carina, and inferior segments reduced the acute PV reconnection in those with LAWT grade ≥3 (≥1.5 mm).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In this small randomized clinical trial, compared with conventional force‐time integral guided PVI ( n = 40), tailored AI PVI ( n = 40) achieved higher first‐pass isolation, decreased RP, decreased time to complete PVI, and a higher 1‐year AF‐free survival rate 21 . A recent study suggested a modified AI ≥ 199 au/mV (AI/bipolar voltage along the ablation line) for successful left atrial posterior wall isolation 22 . In our study, AI ≥ 500 for the anterior and roof segments and AI ≥ 400 for posterior, carina, and inferior segments reduced the acute PV reconnection in those with LAWT grade ≥3 (≥1.5 mm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our wall thickness cut‐off of ≥2.3 mm was slightly shallower, it can be considered reasonable when taking into account the complex anatomical structures and the impact of respirations and cardiac movements during clinical ablation procedures. Additionally, our group conducted similar evaluations with a different multispline mapping catheter (Penta‐Ray NAV; Biosense Webster) for the cut‐off values of the voltages on the posterior wall lines created using an AI‐guided ablation with a 3.5‐mm open‐irrigated‐tip SmartTouch catheter (power: 45 W [25–35 W when the esophageal temperature rose], target CF > 10 g, target AI: 400–450, ILD < 6 mm) 13 . We also evaluated the voltages on the PVI line (power: 25–30 W, target CF > 10 g, FTI > 400 gs, ILD <6 mm) 8,11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…400-450, ILD < 6 mm). 13 We also evaluated the voltages on the PVI line (power: 25-30 W, target CF > 10 g, FTI > 400 gs, ILD <6 mm). 8,11 Those evaluations identified cut-off values of ≥2.64 mV for the voltages to predict failure sites on the posterior wall lines and a voltage cut-off of ≥2.69 mV for PVI failure sites.…”
Section: Ablation Outcomes On the Chronic Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation