2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/305872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Carbon Nanotube Paste Electrode for Voltammetric Determination of Carbidopa, Folic Acid, and Tryptophan

Abstract: A simple and convenient method is described for voltammetric determination of carbidopa (CD), based on its electrochemical oxidation at a modified multiwall carbon nanotube paste electrode. Under optimized conditions, the proposed method exhibited acceptable analytical performances in terms of linearity (over the concentration range from 0.1 to 700.0 μM), detection limit (65.0 nM), and reproducibility (RSD = 2.5%) for a solution containing CD. Also, square wave voltammetry (SWV) was used for simultaneous deter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cys yielded the poorest selectivity because it is electroactive; however, when channel subtraction (self-referencing) between glutamate oxidase-coated sites and sentinel sites was applied, the selectivity improved to 250 ± 80. Others have previously reported the direct oxidation and quantification of amino acids: Arg, , Cys, , Met, Trp, and Tyr . The control sites were less sensitive (83 ± 7% of glutamate response for Arg, Cys, His, Met, Trp, and Tyr), possibly because of coating differences between the control and glutamate sensitive sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cys yielded the poorest selectivity because it is electroactive; however, when channel subtraction (self-referencing) between glutamate oxidase-coated sites and sentinel sites was applied, the selectivity improved to 250 ± 80. Others have previously reported the direct oxidation and quantification of amino acids: Arg, , Cys, , Met, Trp, and Tyr . The control sites were less sensitive (83 ± 7% of glutamate response for Arg, Cys, His, Met, Trp, and Tyr), possibly because of coating differences between the control and glutamate sensitive sites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%