2010
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2010.08.100166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified High-Order PAMs for Binary Coded Physical-Layer Network Coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [91], an algebraic approach was taken and a class of PNC-compatible lattice partitions was found. The complexity of decoding lattice codes with a large alphabet cardinality is high; [92] investigated modified higher-order PAMs for binary-coded PNC.…”
Section: To Probe Furthermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [91], an algebraic approach was taken and a class of PNC-compatible lattice partitions was found. The complexity of decoding lattice codes with a large alphabet cardinality is high; [92] investigated modified higher-order PAMs for binary-coded PNC.…”
Section: To Probe Furthermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the search space is simplified by utilizing the constant modules of MPSK signals regardless of the specific values of the channel coefficients of two links, which allows the proposed scheme to be applicable to the scenario of unbalanced channel states. This is a striking difference between the proposed scheme and the existing schemes which are only applicable when the quality of two links are balanced [18] [19]. According to the ML criterion, the estimate of s NC obtained by using yy * is given aŝ…”
Section: A Single-antenna Pnc-specific Detectormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…different superposed signals may be mapped into the same symbol. However, the well known XOR mapping method causes ambiguity that identical superposed signals are mapped into different symbols when high-level modulations are performed [4], [5]. The resolution proposed by [5] increases sum levels at R and adopts bijective mapping, which reduces Euclidean distances and excludes benefits from non-bijective mapping.…”
Section: Ambiguity In Denoise Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the well known XOR mapping method causes ambiguity that identical superposed signals are mapped into different symbols when high-level modulations are performed [4], [5]. The resolution proposed by [5] increases sum levels at R and adopts bijective mapping, which reduces Euclidean distances and excludes benefits from non-bijective mapping. Nevertheless, without increasing the number of constellation points, recent design to avoid ambiguity proposed by [22] maintains the non-bijective mapping.…”
Section: Ambiguity In Denoise Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%