2016
DOI: 10.1177/0898756416637172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Labial Button Technique for Maintaining Occlusion After Caudal Mandibular Fracture/Temporomandibular Joint Luxation in the Cat

Abstract: Maxillofacial trauma in cats often results in mandibular symphyseal separation in addition to injuries of the caudal mandible and/or temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Caudal mandibular and TMJ injuries are difficult to access and stabilize using direct fixation techniques, thus indirect fixation is commonly employed. The immediate goals of fixation include stabilization for return to normal occlusion and function with the long-term objective of bony union. Indirect fixation techniques commonly used for stabilizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8] Stabilization of mandibular fractures can be achieved with non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques (muzzling, sutures through labial buttons, interarch splinting, or interdental wiring and intraoral splinting) or invasive techniques (intraosseous wiring, external skeletal fixation, and bone plating). 5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] Stabilization techniques in immature dogs are limited because of the presence of dental germs in the jaw bone, the absence of sufficiently erupted permanent teeth, the softness of the bone, and the potential for interference with dental and jaw development. 9,[13][14][15] Complications derived from mandibular fractures include mal-union or non-union, malocclusion, infection, and periodontal and/or endodontic disease of teeth in or near the jaw fracture line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Stabilization of mandibular fractures can be achieved with non-invasive and minimally invasive techniques (muzzling, sutures through labial buttons, interarch splinting, or interdental wiring and intraoral splinting) or invasive techniques (intraosseous wiring, external skeletal fixation, and bone plating). 5,[7][8][9][10][11][12] Stabilization techniques in immature dogs are limited because of the presence of dental germs in the jaw bone, the absence of sufficiently erupted permanent teeth, the softness of the bone, and the potential for interference with dental and jaw development. 9,[13][14][15] Complications derived from mandibular fractures include mal-union or non-union, malocclusion, infection, and periodontal and/or endodontic disease of teeth in or near the jaw fracture line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei dem Lippenverschluss mit Knöpfen ( Abb. 11 ) handelt es sich um 2 Knöpfe seitlich auf dem Nasenrücken, die mit nicht-resorbierbarem Nahtmaterial subkutan mit einem Knopf unter der Mandibula verbunden werden 14 .…”
Section: Chirurgische Versorgungunclassified
“…In this situation a maxillary–mandibular ESF, cerclage wire, dental bonding, labial reverse suture through buttons or a bi-gnathic encircling and retaining device (BEARD technique) is recommended. 2,3,5,6,11,13,24 Techniques more commonly used for uni- or bilateral caudal mandibular or TMJ injuries are described in the box above.…”
Section: Disorders Of the Temporomandibular Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%