2013
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2013.787691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified likelihood ratio tests in heteroskedastic multivariate regression models with measurement error

Abstract: In this paper, we develop modified versions of the likelihood ratio test for multivariate heteroskedastic errors-in-variables regression models. The error terms are allowed to follow a multivariate distribution in the elliptical class of distributions, which has the normal distribution as a special case. We derive the Skovgaard adjusted likelihood ratio statistics, which follow a chisquared distribution with a high degree of accuracy. We conduct a simulation study and show that the proposed tests display super… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General results for structural heteroskedastic models are presented by Patriota et al (2009), Patriota et al (2011), and Melo et al (2013, among others. Instead, in our work, as in Vilca-Labra et al (2011), we take the calibration model on its own grounds and explore specific inferential problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General results for structural heteroskedastic models are presented by Patriota et al (2009), Patriota et al (2011), and Melo et al (2013, among others. Instead, in our work, as in Vilca-Labra et al (2011), we take the calibration model on its own grounds and explore specific inferential problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, it is often doubtful and suffers from a lack of robustness against influential observations on the parameter estimates. For this reason, several works have considered relaxations of the normality assumption, such as considering asymmetric distributions, see , Kheradmandi and Rasekh (2015) and models based on distributions with tails heavier than the ones of a normal distribution, see Cao, Lin and Zhu (2012), Melo, Ferrari and Patriota (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%