2022
DOI: 10.1177/17562848221136331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Mayo score versus Mayo score for evaluation of treatment efficacy in patients with ulcerative colitis: data from the tofacitinib OCTAVE program

Abstract: Objectives: The subjectivity of the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) is a limitation of the Mayo score in assessing severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). We compared treatment efficacy using endpoint definitions based on modified Mayo (mMayo) score, versus those based on Mayo score, using data from the tofacitinib OCTAVE program. Design: This post hoc analysis included data from two 8-week induction studies (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2) and a 52-week maintenance study (OCTAVE Sustain). Methods: Remission and clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the partial Mayo Score comprised only of the stool frequency and bleeding can indicate the patient-perceived clinical response as well as the complete Mayo Score. In addition, Sandborn et al proposed a modified Mayo Score (mMayo) which excludes the subjectivity of the physical global assessment, by applying it over two 8-week induction studies (OCTAVE induction 1 and 2) and a 52-week maintenance study (OCTAVE sustain) [19]. Thus, a significant effect of tofacitinib versus placebo was highlighted using the mMayo, which is consistent with the previously reported data using the original Mayo Score.…”
Section: Variable Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, the partial Mayo Score comprised only of the stool frequency and bleeding can indicate the patient-perceived clinical response as well as the complete Mayo Score. In addition, Sandborn et al proposed a modified Mayo Score (mMayo) which excludes the subjectivity of the physical global assessment, by applying it over two 8-week induction studies (OCTAVE induction 1 and 2) and a 52-week maintenance study (OCTAVE sustain) [19]. Thus, a significant effect of tofacitinib versus placebo was highlighted using the mMayo, which is consistent with the previously reported data using the original Mayo Score.…”
Section: Variable Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 69%
“… 10 In a post hoc analysis of data from the OCTAVE program, clinical remission at week 52, defined by total Mayo score, was observed in 40.6% of patients who received tofacitinib (10 mg twice daily) compared with 42.1% when a modified Mayo score was used. 11 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If not, the treatment was deemed to be invalid (bad short-term prognosis). The mMayo score comprises three subscores: endoscopic findings, stool frequency, and rectal bleeding, as recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [ 10 ]. Clinical response was defined as rapid relief of clinical symptoms including stool frequency and rectal bleeding.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%