2015
DOI: 10.4167/jbv.2015.45.4.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Method of Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) for Serotyping inSalmonellaSpecies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schemes targeting seven genes are typically considered the “classical” MLST approach; this typing approach was originally proposed for isolates of Neisseria meningitidis (Liu, 2010). In this review, we focus on the most widely used Salmonella scheme targeting seven housekeeping genes [ aroC , dnaN , hemD , hisD , thrA , sucA , and purE ; hereafter denoted as legacy MLST to distinguish newer approaches (described below)] (Li et al, 2009; Yun et al, 2015). It was first introduced for Salmonella Typhi in 2002 (Kidgell et al, 2002), and extended to all Salmonella serovars in 2012 (Achtman et al, 2012; Figure 1).…”
Section: Banding Pattern-based and Sequencing-based Characterization mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Schemes targeting seven genes are typically considered the “classical” MLST approach; this typing approach was originally proposed for isolates of Neisseria meningitidis (Liu, 2010). In this review, we focus on the most widely used Salmonella scheme targeting seven housekeeping genes [ aroC , dnaN , hemD , hisD , thrA , sucA , and purE ; hereafter denoted as legacy MLST to distinguish newer approaches (described below)] (Li et al, 2009; Yun et al, 2015). It was first introduced for Salmonella Typhi in 2002 (Kidgell et al, 2002), and extended to all Salmonella serovars in 2012 (Achtman et al, 2012; Figure 1).…”
Section: Banding Pattern-based and Sequencing-based Characterization mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legacy MLST can deliver results more rapidly than PFGE (Shi et al, 2015; Yun et al, 2015; Table 1), and the publicly available databases and online query system enable legacy MLST results to be highly reproducible and exchangeable between laboratories. However, legacy MLST shows lower discriminatory power than PFGE and MLVA, which limits its application to further discriminate isolates within a given serovar (Torpdahl et al, 2005; Alcaine et al, 2006; Foley et al, 2006; Harbottle et al, 2006; Hauser et al, 2012; Ngoi et al, 2015), and for source attribution (Barco et al, 2013).…”
Section: Banding Pattern-based and Sequencing-based Characterization mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From each sample, one isolate representative of each a serogroup-antimicrobial susceptibility testing result pattern was investigated by Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST). The MLST scheme followed is based on seven loci aro C, dna N, hem D, his D, pur E, suc A and thr A (Yun et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ST of five STMC strains was determined using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The internal fragments of seven housekeeping genes ( aroC , dnaN , hemD , hisD , purE , sucA , and thrA ) were amplified using specific primers identified on the MLST website followed by DNA sequencing (Table S4) 30,31 . The sequence was compared with existing alleles in the PubMLST Salmonella genome database (https://pubmlst.org/salmonella/) to determine allele numbers and ST.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%