2013
DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2012.676247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified Paik–Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More details on the features of these two methods can be found in Paik and Thayamballi (2003) and Hughes and Paik (2010). (Paik et al, 2013).…”
Section: Target Stuctures and Applied Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More details on the features of these two methods can be found in Paik and Thayamballi (2003) and Hughes and Paik (2010). (Paik et al, 2013).…”
Section: Target Stuctures and Applied Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Paik et al (2012) applied the design formula (analytical) method, this study focuses on the differences between the ISFEM (ALPS/HULL) (ALPS/HULL, 2012) and the design formula methods (modified Paik and Mansour method or modified P-M method) (Paik et al, 2013) in assessing the safety of damaged ship structures. The results from the two methods are compared to determine the most practical approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Garbatov [9] performed hull girder ultimate strength verification according to the Class Society rules based on experimental results and the dimensional theory. Some other ultimate strength approaches can be found in [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yao and Nikolov (1992) constructed a practical computer code for progressive collapse analysis utilising this method. Moreover, the analytical method for the ultimate strength calculation of the ship hull was proposed by Paik and Mansour (1995) and this method was modified so as to be more general (Paik et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%