2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modular finite state machines: Development and application to reconfigurable manufacturing cell controller generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of SCT, the benefit of modularity in avoiding the state space explosion generated by the synthesis algorithms has been widely demonstrated (De Queiroz & Cury 2002, Vahidi et al 2006, Endsley et al 2006. Several extensions of the original framework have been proposed, such as:…”
Section: Control Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the field of SCT, the benefit of modularity in avoiding the state space explosion generated by the synthesis algorithms has been widely demonstrated (De Queiroz & Cury 2002, Vahidi et al 2006, Endsley et al 2006. Several extensions of the original framework have been proposed, such as:…”
Section: Control Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a syntactic point of view, IEC 61499 3 provides a function block structure where the clear separation between execution control and algorithm description facilitates dynamic reconfiguration. From a semantic point of view, interoperability requires the standardisation of component interfaces and behaviour as well as the definition of a collaboration protocol (Endsley et al 2006;Wright & Bourne, 1988;Newman et al, 2000).…”
Section: Dynamic Reconfiguration Of Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most common approaches are Finite State Machines (FSM) and Petri nets; both allow for formal verification of the correctness of a control system. However, despite significant research advances in recent years, these formal techniques have not been widely employed in industry (Endsley et al, 2006). We believe that such approaches are still low-level formalisms, resulting in large and unwieldy systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reasons are given in [4], including modeling difficulties and state space explosion. This problem is further discussed in [5], [6], and [7], where in the latter a formal language for hierarchical operations and sequences of operations (SOPs) are introduced to support controller synthesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%