2015 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ssrr.2015.7442943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modularity for maximum mobility and manipulation: Control of a reconfigurable legged robot with series-elastic actuators

Abstract: Abstract-We present a set of modular series-elastic actuators (SEAs) that allow rapid and robust prototyping of mobile legged robots. The SEA modules were originally developed for a snake robot, SEA Snake, and have recently been reconfigured into Snake Monster, a multi-modal walking robot that can be easily adapted to hexapod, quadruped, and biped configurations. The use of SEAs allows the implementation of a compliant hybrid controller using both position and force-based walking. This paper presents the mecha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synchronization permits different actuators to oscillate with a prescribed phase lead or lag to regulate different movement patterns. On the basis of the joint number, structure connection and behavioral characteristics of different robots [legged robot (Kalouche et al, 2015; Bjelonic et al, 2016; Owaki and Ishiguro, 2017), snake robot (Wang et al, 2016), swimming robot (Stefanini et al, 2006), and flying robot (Corke et al, 2003; Ramezani et al, 2017)], the behavior control networks are also different. The type of oscillator (Wang et al, 2018) and phase difference (Aoi et al, 2011) formation method are also important factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronization permits different actuators to oscillate with a prescribed phase lead or lag to regulate different movement patterns. On the basis of the joint number, structure connection and behavioral characteristics of different robots [legged robot (Kalouche et al, 2015; Bjelonic et al, 2016; Owaki and Ishiguro, 2017), snake robot (Wang et al, 2016), swimming robot (Stefanini et al, 2006), and flying robot (Corke et al, 2003; Ramezani et al, 2017)], the behavior control networks are also different. The type of oscillator (Wang et al, 2018) and phase difference (Aoi et al, 2011) formation method are also important factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the trial‐and‐error behavior of animals to adapt to injuries, learning algorithms can be used to enable a robot to rapidly adapt to damage (Cully, Clune, Tarapore, & Mouret, ), for example, to the loss of a limb in a legged robot or to reduced range of motion in one of its joints. Modularity and reconfigurability are also appealing properties for legged robot designs (Kalouche, Rollinson, & Choset, ), particularly in SAR situations, in which the morphology of the robot can be adapted to best suit the environment in a rapid deployment. Legged platforms that are capable of being easily reconfigured for different missions with modular sensor and actuation payloads (Hutter et al, ) offer appealing properties as well, by enabling operation throughout all of the phases of the disaster cycle.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platforms such as Snapbot [28][29][30] and Snake Monster [31] connect modular component around a purpose designed torso. Both platforms demonstrate mobility with different numbers of modules attached.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%