2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.701331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modularity in Biological Networks

Abstract: Network modeling, from the ecological to the molecular scale has become an essential tool for studying the structure, dynamics and complex behavior of living systems. Graph representations of the relationships between biological components open up a wide variety of methods for discovering the mechanistic and functional properties of biological systems. Many biological networks are organized into a modular structure, so methods to discover such modules are essential if we are to understand the biological system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
(321 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only communities from the Louvain algorithm were used for further analysis given that it consistently obtained the highest modularity values (Table 3). Moreover, this algorithm has proved to be successful for biological networks and their association to functional features (92,93) Nominal assortativity. To calculate chromosomal assortativity, we used the chromosome location for each gene.…”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only communities from the Louvain algorithm were used for further analysis given that it consistently obtained the highest modularity values (Table 3). Moreover, this algorithm has proved to be successful for biological networks and their association to functional features (92,93) Nominal assortativity. To calculate chromosomal assortativity, we used the chromosome location for each gene.…”
Section: Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second group of tools in netZoo were developed to identify and explore higher-order structure in biological networks [34, 35] by identifying highly connected network “communities” and comparing the structure of these communities between phenotypic states. CONDOR [21] identifies communities in bipartite graphs (including eQTL networks and GRNs), while ALPACA [22] finds differential community structures between two networks, such as in a case versus control setting, by going beyond the simple difference of edge weights and using the complete network structure to find differential communities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeRegNet combines prior regulatory networks with omics abundance measurements to identify maximally deregulated subnetworks [101]. Some more of these methods and strategies have been further reviewed by other authors [39,[102][103][104]. Compared to existing methods, SUBATOMIC tries to address open issues and creates a comprehensive analysis framework covering various aspects of module inference (see Additional file 8 that further shows a tabular comparison of the features in-between the here mentioned module inference methods and SUBATOMIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%