2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.08.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulating the zeta potential of cellulose nanocrystals using salts and surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
92
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(7 reference statements)
17
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6c) what is comparable with other published data (Jiang and Hsieh 2013;Prathapana et al 2016;Wei et al 2014). The use of oxidative agent (NaClO) in the extraction procedure (Szymańska-Chargot et al 2017) can result in the hydroxyl groups oxidation to carboxyl ones, which are dissociated in water at neutral pH (Wei et al 2014).…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Nanopaperssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…6c) what is comparable with other published data (Jiang and Hsieh 2013;Prathapana et al 2016;Wei et al 2014). The use of oxidative agent (NaClO) in the extraction procedure (Szymańska-Chargot et al 2017) can result in the hydroxyl groups oxidation to carboxyl ones, which are dissociated in water at neutral pH (Wei et al 2014).…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Nanopaperssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…On the other hand, the zeta potential of CNC/PEG1000, CNC/PL44, and CNC/PEGMONO dispersions presented values lower than 10 mV. The decrease in zeta potential is due to screening effect of surfactant molecules adsorbed onto CNC surface that clearly increases the effective hydrophobicity of CNC and weakens the electrostatically interactions between nanoparticles . Therefore, except for PEG300, the modification of CNC with surfactants reduced zeta potential values to a range that does not support electrostatic repulsion, as the mechanism that control the dispersion stability of dried CNC/S .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effect of surfactants on the formation of the film was evaluated by using anionic SDS and cationic CTAB. Their respective interactions with cellulose are very distinct; whereas CTAB has a strong interaction with CNCs, leading to aggregation from a low relative surfactant concentration, SDS displays negligible interaction with CNCs and predominantly adsorbs at the air–water interface …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%