2013 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/rfid.2013.6548145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation and sensitivity limits for backscatter receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…100 mW [8] 200 m [9] The tunnel diode-based RFID tag can be easily improved. Amplitude modulation and Manchester encoding have already been illustrated by appropriately biasing on and off the tunnel diode; but sophisticated coding techniques ( [10], [11]) can increase the communication distances. These results suggest better requirements in the sensitivity of next generation readers and encourage to implement the described prototype as a single chip component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 mW [8] 200 m [9] The tunnel diode-based RFID tag can be easily improved. Amplitude modulation and Manchester encoding have already been illustrated by appropriately biasing on and off the tunnel diode; but sophisticated coding techniques ( [10], [11]) can increase the communication distances. These results suggest better requirements in the sensitivity of next generation readers and encourage to implement the described prototype as a single chip component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful selection of the bit rate along with the number of inter-bit transitions with regards to a reader’s noise spectral characteristics was shown to maximize sensitivity while being mindful of power or energy consumption by the backscatter RF tag [ 91 ]. This strategy maximizes the sensitivity of the backscatter modulation while maintaining the tag’s power requirements.…”
Section: Communication Issues and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When random body motion appears close to the reader, direct reflection can increase dramatically [6], causing power-dependent phase distortion in the receiver with high-gain RF frontend, even to the degree to jam the receiver entirely. Phase noise in the leakage path also increases the noise floor, resulting in further reduction of receiver sensitivity [9]. In harmonic backscattering, the tag responds by generating second harmonic (SH) at 2ft>, which is far away from^u-Thus, the undesirable self-leakage and direct reflection interference onfo can be readily filtered out.…”
Section: Harmonic Backscatter and Interference Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vr,l<.r<,n,f r éB J The reader keeps sending out sequences of the selected optimized frequencies from (9). The time interval between consecutive frequencies is At s .…”
Section: A Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%