Modulation of feedback related activity in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex during trial and error exploration

Amiez, Céline; Sallet, Jérôme; Procyk, Emmanuel; Petrides, Michael

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.023

Cited by 70 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 89 publications

(134 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, the relationships we report among posterior clusters 1, 2, and 8, and SMA, pre-SMA, and area 8A/FEF Amiez et al, 2006;Amiez and Petrides, 2009). There has been greater uncertainty about how areas in more anterior DFC are related.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(Sakai et al, 2002;Owen et al, 2005;Amiez and Petrides, 2007;Champod and. Activity associated with cognitive branching and the representation and monitoring of counterfactual actions (red dots) is situated nearby but a little more ventrally and anteriorly (Daw et al, 2006;Gilbert et al, 2006;Boorman et al, 2009;Amiez et al, 2012). Activity associated with cognitive control demands is associated with more posterior DFC (green dots) (Kerns et al, 2004;Dosenbach et al, 2007;Duncan, 2010).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The cubic ROIs were placed in the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) centered at MNI coordinates [61,9,31] Anatomical and functional evidence suggests that there are homologies between each of these target regions in humans and macaques: PMd and PMv (Passingham et al, 1998;Geyer et al, 2000;Passingham and Toni, 2001;Picard and Strick, 2001;; LIP, SPL, and PC Sereno et al, 2001;Astafiev et al, 2003;Grefkes and Fink, 2005;Swisher et al, 2007;Scheperjans et al, 2008b;Hinkley et al, 2009;Margulies et al, 2009;Mars et al, 2011);IPLc, IPLm, IPLr, and POp (Culham et al, 2003;Eickhoff et al, 2010;Mars et al, 2011); PFvr, PFvc, and vmPFC Mackey and Petrides, 2010); ACCr, MCC, and PCC (Picard andStrick, 1996, 2001;Margulies et al, 2009;Vogt, 2009;Amiez and Petrides, 2012); TP (Blaizot et al, 2010); and amygdala (Aggleton, 2000).…”

Section: ϫ2mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9d). This region of the human brain is active when the eyes, or the focus of visual attention, move (Amiez et al, 2006;Amiez and Petrides, 2009), and so it has been identified with the frontal eye field (FEF) of the macaque.…”

Section: Six Clusters In the Dorsolateral Frontal Cortexmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…9e). The area, like PMd in the macaque, is active especially when arm movements, as opposed to eye movements, are made, especially when the rule linking the cue to the action is an arbitrary or learned one (Murray et al, 2000;Passingham et al, 2000;Amiez et al, 2006).…”

Section: Six Clusters In the Dorsolateral Frontal Cortexmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Organization of Dorsal Frontal Cortex in Humans and Macaques

Sallet

Mars

Noonan

et al. 2013

Journal of Neuroscience

409

415

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The human dorsal frontal cortex has been associated with the most sophisticated aspects of cognition, including those that are thought to be especially refined in humans. Here we used diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and functional MRI (fMRI) in humans and macaques to infer and compare the organization of dorsal frontal cortex in the two species. Using DW-MRI tractographybased parcellation, we identified 10 dorsal frontal regions lying between the human inferior frontal sulcus and cingulate cortex. Patterns of functional coupling between each area and the rest of the brain were then estimated with fMRI and compared with functional coupling patterns in macaques. Areas in human medial frontal cortex, including areas associated with high-level social cognitive processes such as theory of mind, showed a surprising degree of similarity in their functional coupling patterns with the frontal pole, medial prefrontal, and dorsal prefrontal convexity in the macaque. We failed to find evidence for "new" regions in human medial frontal cortex. On the lateral surface, comparison of functional coupling patterns suggested correspondences in anatomical organization distinct from those that are widely assumed. A human region sometimes referred to as lateral frontal pole more closely resembled area 46, rather than the frontal pole, of the macaque. Overall the pattern of results suggest important similarities in frontal cortex organization in humans and other primates, even in the case of regions thought to carry out uniquely human functions. The patterns of interspecies correspondences are not, however, always those that are widely assumed.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%