2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470513965.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of Nicotine Receptors by Chronic Exposure to Nicotinic Agonists and Antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the interval of 21 d was thought to be the recovery time during which upregulated nAChRs return to the level of the nonsmoker. This suggests that nicotineinduced upregulation of receptor number is a temporary effect, similar to that found in rodents (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the present study, the interval of 21 d was thought to be the recovery time during which upregulated nAChRs return to the level of the nonsmoker. This suggests that nicotineinduced upregulation of receptor number is a temporary effect, similar to that found in rodents (28,29).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Disruption of glucocorticoid synthesis or blockade of CRF receptors suppresses stimulant self-administration (Goeders, 2002). Glucocorticoids may attenuate CNS sensitivity to nicotine (Caggiula et al, 1998;Collins et al, 1990), leading to a withdrawal-like state under conditions of high stress. On the other hand, longterm exposure to nicotine may lead to alterations in the stress response, providing a possible mechanism through which stress increases craving and risk for relapse.…”
Section: Discussion and Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6). This model is based on studies reviewed above and builds on research models with other drugs of addiction, indicating that drug deprivation and stress may produce strong motivational states leading to reinstatement of drug administration (Buczek et al, 1999;Epping-Jordan et al, 1998;Koob and Le Moal, 1997;Collins et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussion and Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was based on a minimum period of five half-lives (galantamine plasma half-life ∼7 h; Lilienfeld 2002) to ensure significant clearance based on pharmacokinetics. Furthermore, a 3-day washout period was also selected based on animal studies showing that nicotinic agonists (including nicotine) can induce upregulation of nAChRs, with receptor density returning to control levels within 7-10 days in mice ([ 3 H]-nicotine binding; Marks et al 1985) and 15-20 days in rats ([ 3 H]-cytisine binding; Koylu et al 1997) after cessation of treatment (for review, see Collins et al 1990). Therefore, the 3-day washout period not only ensured significant clearance of galantamine but also made it unlikely that receptor density would return to baseline levels before the post-treatment PET scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%