2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06579-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of somatosensation by transcranial magnetic stimulation over somatosensory cortex: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, although the threshold changes induced by iTBS did differ from the baseline phase, they did not show significant differences when directly compared to control sessions (sham or no stimulation). This is consistent with previous TBS studies on the hand showing that the effect of iTBS over S1 tends to be less robust and stable than that of cTBS (see review, Tang et al, 2023). Spatial amplitude discrimination relies on a combination of excitation within and inhibition between adjacent cortical columns in the S1 (Friedman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, although the threshold changes induced by iTBS did differ from the baseline phase, they did not show significant differences when directly compared to control sessions (sham or no stimulation). This is consistent with previous TBS studies on the hand showing that the effect of iTBS over S1 tends to be less robust and stable than that of cTBS (see review, Tang et al, 2023). Spatial amplitude discrimination relies on a combination of excitation within and inhibition between adjacent cortical columns in the S1 (Friedman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Participants were trained to maintain the target level of muscle contraction using EMG feedback from the electrodes placed on the tongue, displayed visually on a computer monitor. S1 was initially localized by moving 2 cm posterior from M1 hotspot on the cortex as measured using Brainsight Neuronavigation (Tang et al, 2023). If single-pulse TMS over this region elicited MEPs from the tongue muscles, the coil was moved posteriorly until tongue MEPs were no longer elicited.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Administering oral morphine among 14 healthy adults modulated the medial frontopolar cortex area (mFP; medial Brodmann area10) [ 23 ]. Noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation stimulated the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [ 24 ] or primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and the second somatosensory cortex (S2) to control pain [ 25 ]. Using 15 healthy adult volunteers, VR gaming altered PFC to control thermal pain, in which functional near-infrared spectroscopy captured PFC and S1/S2 signals [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 More importantly, in a study that investigated treatment effects of rTMS with DLPFC targeting in depression, these regions have also been observed with alterations after a seed‐based connectivity analysis. 28 Notably, somatosensory regions are related to proprioception, 29 while limbic regions including cingulate cortex usually are in charge of receiving inputs or external stimulations from other brain regions and involved in complicated and interconnected cognitive and emotional processing. 30 While the TMS has been suggested to act through a top‐down mechanism, 27 it could be inferred that some specific neural circuit is evoked after DLPFC stimulation, in which somatosensory regions percept the stimulations whereas the limbic regions process them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%