2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulation of the mismatch negativity (MMN) to vowel duration changes in native speakers of Finnish and German as a result of language experience

Abstract: While crucial for phoneme distinctions in the Finnish language, mere vowel duration is of lower relevance as a phonetically distinctive cue in the German language. To investigate the pre-attentive processing of vowel duration between these two languages, the mismatch negativity (MMN), a component of the auditory event-related potential (ERP) that is an index of automatic auditory change detection, was measured in Finnish and German native speakers for vowel duration changes embedded in the pseudoword sasa. Vow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
49
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
9
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, MMN is sensitive to changes in vowels that are relevant for one speaker's langauge, such as vowel duration, but not for another speaker's language (Kirmse et al, 2008). In line with previous findings, our MMN measured to within-category stimuli was quite small .…”
Section: Prototypicalitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, MMN is sensitive to changes in vowels that are relevant for one speaker's langauge, such as vowel duration, but not for another speaker's language (Kirmse et al, 2008). In line with previous findings, our MMN measured to within-category stimuli was quite small .…”
Section: Prototypicalitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Frequently used consonant clusters elicited a larger MMN than sequences with a low probability of occurrence. These findings are in accord with previous studies of language-familiarity using the MMN, which have been documented for the phoneme level (e.g., Dehaene-Lambertz, 1997;Näätänen et al, 1997;Sharma and Dorman, 2000;Winkler et al, 1999; for a review, see Näätänen et al, 2007), the syllable level (e.g., Kirmse et al, 2008), and the lexical level (e.g., Pulvermüller et al, 2001;Jacobsen et al, 2004). In these studies, familiar items elicited larger MMN amplitudes reflecting long-term memory contribution.…”
Section: Grammatical Versus Familiarity Effectsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These include a number that have focused specifically on duration (or quantity) as a phonemic feature (Nenonen et al, 2003; Nenonen et al, 2005; Menning et al, 2002; Kirmse, Ylinen, Tervaniemi, Vainio, Schröger, and Jacobsen, 2008; Tervaniemi, Kruck, Baene, Schröger, Alter, & Friederici, 2009). All of these studies used a passive oddball design, in which the participant is asked to ignore the auditory modality and watch a video with the sound muted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%