2000
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.12.1217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modulatory Influence of Feedback Projections from Area 21a on Neuronal Activities in Striate Cortex of the Cat

Abstract: We have examined the influence of 'feedback' projections from extrastriate visual cortical area 21a on the responses of neurons in area 17 of the cat, by cooling area 21a to 5-10 degrees C while the temperature over the recording sites was kept at 36 degrees C. Orientation, direction and length selectivities as well as contrast sensitivity were tested before and during cooling and after rewarming of area 21a. Overall, for the sample of cells recorded from the part of area 17 visuotopically corresponding to are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
70
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
12
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was significantly more pronounced in area 18 than in areas 17 and 19 and affected calbindin-positive cells to a larger degree than parvalbumin-positive cells (Huxlin and Pasternak, 2004). This is consistent with electrophysiological studies, which show that when higher level visual cortical areas are temporarily inactivated, cortical neurons at earlier levels of the visual system exhibit a decrease in the amplitude of their responses to stimulation (Hupe et al, 1998;Wang et al, 2000;Galuske et al, 2002;Bardy et al, 2006). This suggests that the major influence of feedback projections on early visual neurons is excitatory in nature.…”
Section: Unilateral Ls Lesions Cause Bilateral Decreases In Ampa Recesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This effect was significantly more pronounced in area 18 than in areas 17 and 19 and affected calbindin-positive cells to a larger degree than parvalbumin-positive cells (Huxlin and Pasternak, 2004). This is consistent with electrophysiological studies, which show that when higher level visual cortical areas are temporarily inactivated, cortical neurons at earlier levels of the visual system exhibit a decrease in the amplitude of their responses to stimulation (Hupe et al, 1998;Wang et al, 2000;Galuske et al, 2002;Bardy et al, 2006). This suggests that the major influence of feedback projections on early visual neurons is excitatory in nature.…”
Section: Unilateral Ls Lesions Cause Bilateral Decreases In Ampa Recesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…by cooling deactivation of pMS cortex are based on: (i) actual changes in the preferred directions of less selective neurons and (ii) silencing, or near silencing, of neurons with the highest degree of direction selectivity. It is important to recognize that the functional impact of pMS deactivation on area 18 neurons reported in our study is high compared with prior studies on other cortical feedback systems (5)(6)(7)23). The higher impact can be accounted for by the larger region of feedback pathway origin that was deactivated, a more effective deactivation that silences neurons in all layers in contact with the cooling loop, the high density of feedback projections from pMS cortex into upper layers of area 18, and emphasis of the electrophysiological and optical analyses on neurons in those same layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Previous physiological studies show various effects of feedback on RF response properties (Alonso et al, 1993;Hupé et al, 1998Hupé et al, , 2001aMartinez-Conde et al, 1999;Wang et al, 2000). Bullier (2001) and Angelucci and Bullier (2003) suggest that one role of feedback is the selective modification of responses of area 17 neurons to stimuli within the classic receptive field (CRF) when paired with stimuli placed in the surround-a region of visual space outside the CRF in which stimuli do not elicit a response from a given neuron (Maffei and Fiorentini, 1976;Nelson and Frost, 1978;Allman et al, 1985;Gilbert and Wiesel, 1990;Li and Li, 1994;Sillito et al, 1995;Zipser et al, 1996;Levitt and Lund, 1997;Sengpiel et al, 1997;Walker et al, 1999).…”
Section: Indexing Terms: Extrastriate; Neuroanatomy; Receptive Field;mentioning
confidence: 99%