2019
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201901592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MOFBOTS: Metal–Organic‐Framework‐Based Biomedical Microrobots

Abstract: Motile metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) are potential candidates to serve as small‐scale robotic platforms for applications in environmental remediation, targeted drug delivery, or nanosurgery. Here, magnetic helical microstructures coated with a kind of zinc‐based MOF, zeolitic imidazole framework‐8 (ZIF‐8), with biocompatibility characteristics and pH‐responsive features, are successfully fabricated. Moreover, it is shown that this highly integrated multifunctional device can swim along predesigned tracks und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
195
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2-6) Microscale (and nanoscale) robotic systems can be subclassified into at least 2 dimensions: force and operator-control/ autonomy. For the former, microrobots can be described in terms of the forces that are used to manipulate them--for example, photonic (4)(5)(6), magnetic (7)(8)(9), and acoustic (10)(11)(12) forces. For the latter, microrobots can be described as "passive" or "active" in terms of human control over their operations--for example, the operator has limited control over the behavior of passive (or "swimmer"-type) microrobots (3, 10) (but they are highly autonomous), while the operator has great control over active microrobots (2, 4-9, 11, 12) (but they have less autonomy).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2-6) Microscale (and nanoscale) robotic systems can be subclassified into at least 2 dimensions: force and operator-control/ autonomy. For the former, microrobots can be described in terms of the forces that are used to manipulate them--for example, photonic (4)(5)(6), magnetic (7)(8)(9), and acoustic (10)(11)(12) forces. For the latter, microrobots can be described as "passive" or "active" in terms of human control over their operations--for example, the operator has limited control over the behavior of passive (or "swimmer"-type) microrobots (3, 10) (but they are highly autonomous), while the operator has great control over active microrobots (2, 4-9, 11, 12) (but they have less autonomy).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also excluded are metal-organic-framework-based biomedical microrobots, called MOFBOTS, which are at least a few micrometers in diameter. 20 Naturally, the delimitation to the nanoscale also excludes larger micro-sized robots, such as the 400 × 800 μm tumbling micromotor. 21 The exclusion of such micro-sized devises in this review is done to enable a focus on nano-sized devises, which might potentially exhibit unique hazardous properties due to their small size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field generated by Helmholtz coils and helical magnetic microrobots have been widely used for many studies and biological applications [13]. Various feasible methods have been used to fabricate micro/nano-scale helical robots, such as 3D direct laser writing [14], biotemplated synthesis [15], self-scrolling [16] and 4D printing technology [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%