2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moho determination from GOCE gradiometry data over Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous geophysical techniques, such as receiver function analysis (Ahmed et al, 2013(Ahmed et al, , 2022Dugda et al, 2005;Ebinger et al, 2017;Hammond et al, 2011;Keranen et al, 2009;Kibret et al, 2019Kibret et al, , 2022Kibret et al, , 2023Lavayssière et al, 2018;Ogden et al, 2019Ogden et al, , 2023Stuart et al, 2006), inversion of seismic data including tomography (Alemayehu et al, 2023;Chambers et al, 2019;Eshetu et al, 2021;Kounoudis et al, 2023;Petruska & Eilon, 2022), controlled source seismic (Berckhemer et al, 1975;Maguire et al, 2006;Makris & Ginzburg, 1987) and gravity (Cornwell et al, 2006;Gedamu et al, 2020;Globig et al, 2016;Kassa et al, 2021;Lewi et al, 2016;Mahatsente et al, 1999;Mickus et al, 2007;Tedla et al, 2011;Tiberi et al, 2005;Woldetinsae & Götze, 2005), have been used to examine the crustal thickness in the region. According to these studies, crustal thickness varies substantially over the region, ranging from an average maximum depth of about 46 km beneath Northwestern Ethiopian Plateau (NWEP) to about 7 km in the GAR and even to less than 4 km in the RSR (e.g., Ahmed et al, 2013;Hammond et al, 2011;Keranen et al, 2009;Maguire et al, 2006).…”
Section: Crustal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous geophysical techniques, such as receiver function analysis (Ahmed et al, 2013(Ahmed et al, , 2022Dugda et al, 2005;Ebinger et al, 2017;Hammond et al, 2011;Keranen et al, 2009;Kibret et al, 2019Kibret et al, , 2022Kibret et al, , 2023Lavayssière et al, 2018;Ogden et al, 2019Ogden et al, , 2023Stuart et al, 2006), inversion of seismic data including tomography (Alemayehu et al, 2023;Chambers et al, 2019;Eshetu et al, 2021;Kounoudis et al, 2023;Petruska & Eilon, 2022), controlled source seismic (Berckhemer et al, 1975;Maguire et al, 2006;Makris & Ginzburg, 1987) and gravity (Cornwell et al, 2006;Gedamu et al, 2020;Globig et al, 2016;Kassa et al, 2021;Lewi et al, 2016;Mahatsente et al, 1999;Mickus et al, 2007;Tedla et al, 2011;Tiberi et al, 2005;Woldetinsae & Götze, 2005), have been used to examine the crustal thickness in the region. According to these studies, crustal thickness varies substantially over the region, ranging from an average maximum depth of about 46 km beneath Northwestern Ethiopian Plateau (NWEP) to about 7 km in the GAR and even to less than 4 km in the RSR (e.g., Ahmed et al, 2013;Hammond et al, 2011;Keranen et al, 2009;Maguire et al, 2006).…”
Section: Crustal Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more than a decade, several methods for estimating Moho undulations using gravity disturbances have been revolutionized (Abrehdary et al., 2017; Abrehdary & Sjöberg, 2019, 2021; Ashagrie et al., 2020; Bagherbandi & Eshagh, 2012; Eshagh, 2014; Eshagh & Hussain, 2016). Among the inversion methods most used by the scientific community, we can include the VMM (Vening Meinesz–Moritz) method (Eshagh, 2016), the direct gravity inversion method (Chen & Tenzer, 2017a), and the Generalized Parker‐Oldenburg method (Chen & Tenzer, 2017b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%