2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-018-0989-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Moisture content monitoring in glulam structures by embedded sensors via electrical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mathematical relationship between the resistance and MC proposed by Forsén and Tarvainen (2000) more suitably fitted the experimental values than that suggested by Skaar (1988). However, Li et al (2018) determined a satisfactory overlap with the latter's proposed relationship. The fit is material-related and therefore, the range of validity and possible errors constitute relevant information for the future publication of curves fitting resistance with MC.…”
Section: Electrical Resistance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mathematical relationship between the resistance and MC proposed by Forsén and Tarvainen (2000) more suitably fitted the experimental values than that suggested by Skaar (1988). However, Li et al (2018) determined a satisfactory overlap with the latter's proposed relationship. The fit is material-related and therefore, the range of validity and possible errors constitute relevant information for the future publication of curves fitting resistance with MC.…”
Section: Electrical Resistance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The advantage of the electric resistance method is that it is more robust and can be used in the over-hygroscopic range (Li et al 2018). However, Niklewski (2018) stated large uncertainties and inaccurate MC measurements when using the electrical resistance methods in the overhygroscopic range.…”
Section: Comparison Between Electrical Resistance Methods and Sorption Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MC of wood can be determined using different methods, amongst which the electrical resistance method (measured between two electrodes) and the sorption method (the measurement of climate in a void) are the most common [1,9,10,22,24,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] (Figure 4). The accuracy of the electrical resistance method depends on the wood species and lies between 1 and 2 M% [30].…”
Section: Monitoring Moisture Content Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of different moisture contents on the mechanical behavior of timber members has to be known to avoid cracking, to improve the performance of timber structures, as well as to improve methods for monitoring and maintenance of timber structures, for example, sensor-based monitoring (Fortino et al 2013) and coating-based maintenance (Fragiacomo et al 2011). Several methods are used for monitoring moisture contents in the glulam members (Dietsch et al 2015b;Li et al 2018). Based on measurements of a mid-span deflection of a glulam beam (Mohager and Toratti 1993;Srpčič et al 2009) or a uniaxial deformation of small glulam specimens (Jönsson and Thelandersson 2003;Jönsson 2004Jönsson , 2005Angst and Malo 2012a,b), a mechanical state of the glulam members is determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%