2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.21.476409
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and connectomic vulnerability shape cross-disorder cortical abnormalities

Abstract: Numerous brain disorders demonstrate structural brain abnormalities, which are thought to arise from molecular perturbations or connectome miswiring. The unique and shared contributions of these molecular and connectomic vulnerabilities to brain disorders remain unknown, and has yet to be studied in a single multi-disorder framework. Using MRI morphometry from the ENIGMA consortium, we construct maps of cortical abnormalities for thirteen neurodevelopmental, neurological, and psychiatric disorders from N=21,00… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If so, the lack of an association between G1 and SCZ may be due to limited signal-to-noise, and remains a question for future research. Overall, our results complement recent findings pointing to shared molecular and structural underpinnings across psychiatric disorders [81][82][83][84][85] .…”
Section: (Fig 4e)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…If so, the lack of an association between G1 and SCZ may be due to limited signal-to-noise, and remains a question for future research. Overall, our results complement recent findings pointing to shared molecular and structural underpinnings across psychiatric disorders [81][82][83][84][85] .…”
Section: (Fig 4e)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Correlating this matrix of regional co-susceptibility to disease-associated perturbations against the previously derived matrix of regional co-susceptibility to pharmacological perturbations, we found a statistically significant relationship (Spearman’s rho = 0.29, p < 0.001 after regressing out the effect of Euclidean distance) (Figure 6C). This result goes beyond a recent demonstration that molecular similarity and disorder similarity are correlated 109 , by showing that a correlation also exists between different kinds of perturbations: anatomical and pharmacological.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…To address this question, we computed matrices of pharmacological co-susceptibility and neurotransmitter co-expression between pairs of regions, by correlating respectively the regional patterns of drug-induced FC changes (across all subjects), and the regional patterns of neurotransmitter expression across all 18 receptor and transporter PET maps. To account for spatial autocorrelation in molecular and FC attributes, we regressed out from both matrices the exponential trend with Euclidean distance [109][110][111][112] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were processed previously 78 and used in several studies assessing the impact of connectivity on atrophy. 17,[79][80][81] After exclusion of 4 connectivity maps with aberrant scores (3 structural, 1 functional), the individual structural matrices were transformed into a group-consensus structural connectivity matrix that preserved the brain's edge length distribution; 82 self-connections were converted to zero.…”
Section: Structural and Functional Neighborhood Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%