The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science 2002
DOI: 10.1002/9780470756614.ch12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and Developmental Biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a small number of zebra finches were trained because extensive frequency-range data for this species are already available (see Weisman, Njegovan, Williams, Cohen, & Sturdy, 2004). The chickadees were sexed by blood DNA analysis (Griffiths, 2000), and finches were sexed by beak color and plumage (Zann, 1996). None of the birds had prior experience with the stimuli used in these experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a small number of zebra finches were trained because extensive frequency-range data for this species are already available (see Weisman, Njegovan, Williams, Cohen, & Sturdy, 2004). The chickadees were sexed by blood DNA analysis (Griffiths, 2000), and finches were sexed by beak color and plumage (Zann, 1996). None of the birds had prior experience with the stimuli used in these experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers maintain that biological form in both development (ontogeny) and evolution (phylogeny) is constrained not so much by historical contingencies and pathways as by relational laws , which govern development, morphological structure, and interacting ecologies (Gilbert and Epel ). This means, contra the standard neo‐Darwinian view, that certain morphological forms are possible and even inevitable while others are not (Goodwin , 107; Griffiths , b). Other evolutionary biologists such as Simon Conway Morris and George McGhee have investigated instances of the evolutionary convergence of biological form, showing how countless different historical evolutionary trajectories, which began from radically dissimilar starting places, have arrived at the same morphological destination (Conway Morris , 151; McGhee ).…”
Section: Post‐darwinian Responses To the Problem Of Animal Sufferingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond this, the concept of “innate instinct” as a useful explanatory category has come under serious scientific fire. Many philosophers of biology have judged the genetic “concept of innateness [to be] irretrievably confused” (Griffiths , b, 70) even as biologists have found that much animal “behavior is emergent at the phenotypic level” rather than reducible to the level of instinct or genes (Reid , 337).…”
Section: The Theological Significance Of Animal Intentions and Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently even philosophers of science formulate a basic critic. I just cite (Griffiths, 2002). "The synthetic theory bypassed what were at the time intractable questions of the actual re lationship between stretches of chromosomes and phenotypic traits.…”
Section: Evolutionary Computation and Theories Of Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%