2016
DOI: 10.1515/helmin-2016-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular and ultrastructure characterization of two nematodes(Thelandros scleratus and Physalopteroides dactyluris)based on ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA sequences

Abstract: SummaryThe phylogenetic relationships of the nematode species Thelandros scleratus (Oxyurida: Pharyngodonidae) and Physalopteroides dactyluris (Spirurida: Physalopteridae) were analyzed using the ribosomal 18S rRNA and the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit genes. The nematodes were recovered from Brook's house gecko, Hemidactylus brooki (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) from Hastinapur, Meerut (U.P.), India. The results demonstrated that T. scleratus shows 100% similarity with another sequence available from the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding molecular relationships, only four of the > 90 Parapharyngodon and Thelandros have been sequenced, representing < 5% of the described species. Genetic information, however, is inconclusive regarding the validity of the genera, since the two Thelandros species available ( T. tinerfensis and T. scleratus , the latter formerly assigned to Parapharyngodon scleratus ) are part of a clade including Parapharyngodon sequences (Chaudhary et al ., 2015, 2017; Goswami et al ., 2016). Therefore, there is a need for inclusion of other representatives to assess the evolutionary relationships and taxonomic validity of these two genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding molecular relationships, only four of the > 90 Parapharyngodon and Thelandros have been sequenced, representing < 5% of the described species. Genetic information, however, is inconclusive regarding the validity of the genera, since the two Thelandros species available ( T. tinerfensis and T. scleratus , the latter formerly assigned to Parapharyngodon scleratus ) are part of a clade including Parapharyngodon sequences (Chaudhary et al ., 2015, 2017; Goswami et al ., 2016). Therefore, there is a need for inclusion of other representatives to assess the evolutionary relationships and taxonomic validity of these two genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, morphological identifi cation needs the use of molecular analyses to supplement the proper identifi ca-tion and validation of species. Molecular tools are frequently used in nematode identifi cation and systematics (Gasser, 2001;Nadler et al, 2005;Mattiucci & Nascetti, 2008;Borges et al, 2012;Jones et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013;Pekmezci et al, 2014;Di Azevedo et al, 2015;Goswami et al, 2015Goswami et al, , 2016. In this study, supporting morphological and molecular information is provided for P. spiculogubernaculus Agarwal, 1958 from the freshwater fi sh H. fossilis collected from Ghazipur, Delhi, India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Some authors, for example Moravec et al (1997), considered that the morphological features of Thubunaea and Physalopteroides have rarely been analysed using techniques such as SEM, and that these observations could provide detailed information to assess the validity of these two genera. However, to the best of our knowledge, SEM studies are still scarce in both genera, being available for only three species of Thubunaea (Moravec et al 1997, Pazoki and Rahimian 2014, Ramallo et al 2016) and two species for Physalopteroides (Elwasila 1990, Goswami et al 2016). The specimens described in the present study show a symmetrical cephalic structure, as in Thubunaea .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%