Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach

Abstract

The 26S proteasome is at the executive end of the ubiquitinproteasome pathway for the controlled degradation of intracellular proteins. While the structure of its 20S core particle (CP) has been determined by X-ray crystallography, the structure of the 19S regulatory particle (RP), which recruits substrates, unfolds them, and translocates them to the CP for degradation, has remained elusive. Here, we describe the molecular architecture of the 26S holocomplex determined by an integrative approach based on data from cryoelectron microscopy, X-ray crystallography, residue-specific chemical cross-linking, and several proteomics techniques. The "lid" of the RP (consisting of Rpn3/5/6/7/8/9/11/12) is organized in a modular fashion. Rpn3/5/6/7/9/12 form a horseshoe-shaped heterohexamer, which connects to the CP and roofs the AAAATPase module, positioning the Rpn8/Rpn11 heterodimer close to its mouth. Rpn2 is rigid, supporting the lid, while Rpn1 is conformationally variable, positioned at the periphery of the ATPase ring. The ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 are located in the distal part of the RP, indicating that they were recruited to the complex late in its evolution. The modular structure of the 26S proteasome provides insights into the sequence of events prior to the degradation of ubiquitylated substrates.coiled coils | mass spectrometry | proteasome-COP9-eIF3 domain | proteasome-cyclosome repeats I n eukaryotes, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) is essential for proteostasis: Misfolded proteins or otherwise defective proteins as well as short-lived regulatory proteins are eliminated by degradation (1). The UPP regulates many fundamental cellular processes, such as protein quality control, DNA repair, and signal transduction (for review see ref.2). The 26S proteasome is the most downstream element of the UPP, executing the degradation of polyubiquitylated substrates (3-5). It consists of the barrelshaped core particle (CP; approximately 700 kDa), which sequesters the proteolytically active site in its central cavity, and the regulatory particle (RP; approximately 900 kDa), which is attached at either one or both ends of the CP and prepares substrates for degradation (6).The RP consists of 19 different canonical subunits, including six regulatory particle AAA-ATPase subunits (Rpt1-6) and 13 regulatory particle non-ATPase subunits (Rpn1-3, Rpn5-13, and Rpn15). The integral ubiquitin (Ub) receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 recognize polyubiquitylated substrates (7-9). Alternatively, polyubiquitylated substrates can be recruited by shuttling Ub-receptors (Dsk2, Rad23, Ddi2), which bind to substrates with their Ub-associated domain, and to Rpn1, Rpn10, or Rpn13 at their Ub-like domain (5). The metalloprotease Rpn11 deubiquitylates substrates prior to their degradation (10, 11). The functions of the other Rpn subunits remain to be established. The AAA-ATPases form a hexameric ring that unfolds substrates, opens the gate to the CP, and eventually translocates the substrates to the CP.Electron microscopy (EM) (12) and X-...

Deubiquitylases From Genes to Organism

“…Although crystal structures of proteasomal complexes are unavailable, sub-nanometer resolution structures derived from electron microscopy single-particle analyses provide information on the organization of constituent proteins (16,53,137,141). POH1 is adjacent to the ubiquitin receptor Adrm1/Rpn13 and positioned directly above the AAA-ATPase N-ring (16).…”

Structure of the mammalian oligosaccharyl-transferase complex in the native ER protein translocon

“…In conjunction with orthogonal structural data, our density of the translocon may also allow dissecting the TRAP and OST complexes in further detail using integrative approaches in the future 27 .…”

Structural basis for dynamic regulation of the human 26S proteasome

“…S1) (7)(8)(9)(10). The CP forming the catalytic chamber contains three proteolytically active threonine residues.…”

“…The intact proteasome has not been resolved to a level at which a reliable Cα-backbone can be traced with spatial assignment of amino acids, although major advances have been made in recent years (2,3,(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). Several RP subunits have been resolved at high resolution by X-ray crystallography (14-16, 18, 21-24).…”