Molecular Basis of Soybean Resistance to Soybean Aphids and Soybean Cyst Nematodes

Neupane, Surendra; Purintun, Jordan M; Mathew, Febina M.; Varenhorst, Adam J.; Nepal, Madhav P.

doi:10.3390/plants8100374

Cited by 18 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 240 publications

(352 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To date, 12 Rag genes have been reported on chromosomes Gm07(Rag1, rag1b, and rag1c) (Li et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010b;Nurden et al, 2010;Bales et al, 2013;Hill et al, 2017), Gm08 (Rag6) (Zhang et al, 2017b), Gm13(Rag2, Rag4, rag4, and Rag5-proposed) (Mian et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2010a;Jun et al, 2012;Bales et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2015;Hill et al, 2017), and Gm16(Rag3, rag3, rag3b, and Rag3c) (Zhang et al, 2010;Bales et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2013;Hill et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2017a)(reviewed by Neupane et al (2019a). Additionally, four quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been reported on chromosomes Gm07(qChrom.07.1), Gm13 (qChrom.13.1), Gm16(qChrom.16.1), and Gm17(qChrom.17.1) (Bhusal et al, 2017)(reviewed by Neupane et al (2019a). The type of soybean aphid resistance can be antibiosis (adverse effect on insect biology) or antixenosis (feeding deterrence), and plants exhibiting tolerance (similar yield in the presence or absence of soybean aphids) have also been identified (Painter, 1951;Kogan and Ortman, 1978;Hill et al, 2004;Smith, 2005).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In some instances, knowledge of the susceptible soybean-Aphis glycines interaction is used to explain phenomena related to the resistant soybean-Aphis glycines interaction. This review will not discuss the genomic locations of known Rag loci or QTLs since these aspects have been extensively reviewed by Neupane et al (2019a).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Resistance to soybean aphids is conferred by Resistance to Aphis glycines ( Rag ) genes ( Hill et al., 2004 ). To date, 12 Rag genes have been reported on chromosomes Gm07( Rag1 , rag1b , and rag1c )( Li et al., 2007 ; Zhang et al., 2009 ; Kim et al., 2010b ; Nurden et al., 2010 ; Bales et al., 2013 ; Hill et al., 2017 ), Gm08 ( Rag6 )( Zhang et al., 2017b ), Gm13( Rag2 , Rag4 , rag4 , and Rag5 -proposed)( Mian et al., 2008 ; Zhang et al., 2009 ; Kim et al., 2010a ; Jun et al., 2012 ; Bales et al., 2013 ; Wang et al., 2015 ; Hill et al., 2017 ), and Gm16( Rag3 , rag3 , rag3b , and Rag3c )( Zhang et al., 2010 ; Bales et al., 2013 ; Zhang et al., 2013 ; Hill et al., 2017 ; Zhang et al., 2017a )(reviewed by Neupane et al. (2019a) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2019a) . Additionally, four quantitative trait loci (QTL) have been reported on chromosomes Gm07( qChrom.07.1 ), Gm13( qChrom.13.1 ), Gm16( qChrom.16.1 ), and Gm17( qChrom.17.1 )( Bhusal et al., 2017 )(reviewed by Neupane et al. (2019a) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Resistant Soybean-Aphis glycines Interaction: Current Knowledge and Prospects

Natukunda

MacIntosh

2020

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soybean aphids (Aphis glycines Matsumura) are invasive insect pests of soybean, and they cause significant yield losses. Resistance to soybean aphids is conferred by Resistance to Aphis glycines (Rag) genes. Since the first discovery of aphid-resistant soybean genotypes in 2004, several studies have attempted to characterize Rag genes from aphid-resistant soybean genotypes. To date, 12 Rag genes and four quantitative trait loci for aphid resistance have been reported on soybean chromosomes 07, 08, 13, 16, and 17. Although candidate genes have been proposed for several discovered Rag loci, additional studies are needed to pinpoint, validate, and further explain the potential mechanisms of Rag gene action. A major challenge to utilizing host plant resistance is the discovery of virulent aphid biotypes that can colonize aphid-resistant soybean. This occurrence suggests the need for additional studies to devise strategies to enhance the effectiveness of aphid-resistant soybean. In this mini review, we discuss current knowledge on the resistant soybean-Aphis glycines interaction, potential mechanisms of Rag gene action, opportunities to discover new Rag genes, and prospects for utilization of host plant resistance to manage soybean aphids. A clearer understanding of host plant resistance to soybean aphids will guide researchers on strategies for developing soybean varieties with more durable aphid resistance, reducing the present challenge of virulent aphid biotypes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Resistant Soybean-Aphis glycines Interaction: Current Knowledge and Prospects

Natukunda

MacIntosh

2020

Front. Plant Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Up to now, 16 Rag QTLs (reviewed in Neupane et al 2019 [9]) have been reported in various soybean plant introductions (PI).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Characterization of Induced Susceptibility Effects of Soybean Aphid on Soybean

Neupane

Varenhorst

Nepal

2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Soybean aphid (SBA) is one of the major pests of soybean (Glycine max) in the United States of America. The main objective of this research was to characterize interactions between two different biotypes of soybean aphids in susceptible and resistant soybean cultivars. Demographic and transcriptomic responses of susceptible and resistant (Rag1) soybean cultivars to aphid feeding were investigated in soybean plants colonized by aphids (biotype 1) in the presence or absence of inducer population (biotype 2) at day 1 and day 11. Leaves tissues collected at day 1 and day 11 post infestation were used for RNA sequencing, and ten RNA datasets with 266,535,654 sequence reads were analyzed. In the presence of inducer population, we found 746 and 243 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in susceptible and resistant cultivars, respectively at day 1, whereas 981 and 377 DEGs were found in susceptible and resistant cultivars, respectively at day 11. Enrichment analysis showed a response to chitin, lignin catabolic and metabolic process, asparagine metabolic process, response to chemical unique to treatment with no inducer population, whereas, response to reactive oxygen species, photosynthesis, regulation of endopeptidase activity unique to treatment with inducer population. Furthermore, 14 DEGs were observed in Rag QTLs regions, particularly six DEGs in Rag1 containing QTL. The identified DEGs in the experiment in both resistant and susceptible cultivars during the interaction of soybean and SBA are potential candidates for furthering investigation into induced susceptibility.

show abstract

Integrated genome‐wide association study and QTL mapping reveals qSa‐3A associated with English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) resistance in wheat

Zhao

Yan

Zeng

et al. 2023

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUNDThe English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius), is a devastating pest impacts yield and quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Breeding resistant wheat varieties and detecting resistance genes are important strategies to control aphid.RESULTSIn this study, we evaluated the number of aphids per spike, the rate of thousand kernel weight decrease and aphid index based on three classic resistance mechanisms (antibiosis, tolerance and antixenosis), and detected SNPs/QTLs for resistance to S. avenae in a natural population of 163 varieties with 20 689 high‐quality single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and recombinant inbred line (RIL) population of 164 lines with 3627 diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers. Results showed that 83 loci significantly associated with S. avenae antibiosis and 182 loci significantly associated with S. avenae tolerance were detected by genome‐wide association study (GWAS), explaining 6.47–15.82% and 8.36–35.61% of the phenotypic variances, respectively. The wsnp_Ku_c4568_8243646 detected in two periods was localized at 34.52 Mb on chromosome 3AS. Then, we confirmed a stable QSa.haust‐3A.2 explained 11.19–20.10% of the phenotypic variances in two periods with S. avenae antixenosis in the physical interval of 37.49–37.50 Mb on chromosome 3A in the RIL population. Therefore, a narrow region in the physical interval of 34.52–37.50 Mb on chromosome 3AS was named as qSa‐3A, which was a new locus between wsnp_Ku_c4568_8243646 and QSa.haust‐3A.2 associated with S. avenae resistance.CONCLUSIONWe found qSa‐3A was a new locus associated with S. avenae resistance. The results could be applied in gene cloning and genetic improvement of S. avenae resistance in wheat. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

show abstract

Molecular Basis of Soybean Resistance to Soybean Aphids and Soybean Cyst Nematodes

Cited by 18 publications

References 240 publications

The Resistant Soybean-Aphis glycines Interaction: Current Knowledge and Prospects

The Resistant Soybean-Aphis glycines Interaction: Current Knowledge and Prospects

Characterization of Induced Susceptibility Effects of Soybean Aphid on Soybean

Integrated genome‐wide association study and QTL mapping reveals qSa‐3A associated with English grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) resistance in wheat

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About