1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0248(96)00978-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular-beam-epitaxial growth of Ga1−xInxSb on GaAs substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Native defects in semiconductor thin films strongly affect their electrical properties. It is important to analyze the residual acceptor concentration N A in the InGaSb/PI thin film, as the conduction type of InGaSb depends on the film composition . Therefore, the electron concentrations were measured in the temperature range of 100–300 K. The temperature dependence of the electron concentration n ( T ) can be expressed using the charge‐neutralized condition under the assumption that multiple donors D i ( i = 1, 2,…) and N A are present, as follows ntrue(Ttrue)=truei=1nNDnormalitrue[1fFDtrue(ΔEDnormalitrue)true]NnormalA where NDnormali and fFDtrue(ΔEDnormalitrue) denote the D i concentration and the Fermi–Dirac distribution function of the donor, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Native defects in semiconductor thin films strongly affect their electrical properties. It is important to analyze the residual acceptor concentration N A in the InGaSb/PI thin film, as the conduction type of InGaSb depends on the film composition . Therefore, the electron concentrations were measured in the temperature range of 100–300 K. The temperature dependence of the electron concentration n ( T ) can be expressed using the charge‐neutralized condition under the assumption that multiple donors D i ( i = 1, 2,…) and N A are present, as follows ntrue(Ttrue)=truei=1nNDnormalitrue[1fFDtrue(ΔEDnormalitrue)true]NnormalA where NDnormali and fFDtrue(ΔEDnormalitrue) denote the D i concentration and the Fermi–Dirac distribution function of the donor, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of undoped InSb, interstitial In (In i ) and Sb antisite (Sb In ) have the lowest defect formation energies under In rich and Sb rich conditions, respectively; these defects act as donors because of their positive charge states . The conduction type of InGaSb changes from p ‐type to n ‐type with the increase in the In content . Therefore, D 1 , which has a shallow donor level, is presumed to be In i or Sb In .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epitaxial growth of InGaSb layers on different binary substrates has been reported using different techniques. [1][2][3] Beside the complexity of these techniques, tuning to the 2 m regime usually involves performance deterioration mainly due to the lattice mismatch problems. Lattice mismatch in the grown layers increases dark current and noise, limiting both dynamic range and sensitivity of a detector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%