1977
DOI: 10.1063/1.433908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular beam Zeeman effect and dipole moment sign of ClF

Abstract: Molecular beam electric resonance spectroscopy has been used to observe hyperfine, Stark, and Zeeman properties of chlorine monofluoride. The dipole moment from Zeeman data is 0.85(15), −FCl+, in agreement with the known magnitude. The sign obtained here is the opposite of earlier, less precise, Zeeman results but agrees with calculations and van der Waals molecule experiments. Hyperfine, Stark, and Zeeman properties for 35ClF and 37ClF are reported, including polarizability anisotropy, α∥−α⊥=1.32(8) Å3, molec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the obtained PNOF6 results with the experimental values reported in the literature [6,10,11,[25][26][27][28], as well as with the theoretically computed values of Bundgen et al who used the multi-reference single and double excitation configuration interaction (MRSD-CI) method, and the coupled-cluster single and doubles (CCSD) values calculated by us. Recall that the CCSD values for one-electron properties differ from full-CI results in only 2% if no multiconfigurational character is observed [29], so they can be considered as benchmark calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We compare the obtained PNOF6 results with the experimental values reported in the literature [6,10,11,[25][26][27][28], as well as with the theoretically computed values of Bundgen et al who used the multi-reference single and double excitation configuration interaction (MRSD-CI) method, and the coupled-cluster single and doubles (CCSD) values calculated by us. Recall that the CCSD values for one-electron properties differ from full-CI results in only 2% if no multiconfigurational character is observed [29], so they can be considered as benchmark calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In the case of the nonpolar dihalogens, this is the order of their electric quadrupole moments which have the values 2.8 Â 10 À40 , 10.8(5) Â 10 À40 and 17.5 Â 10 À40 C m 2 for F 2 , Cl 2 and Br 2 , respectively. [38,39] The complexes in which the dihalogen is polar are all more strongly bound than those involving nonpolar species and the order is the order of the electric dipole moments of the halogen, namely BrCl [40] < ClF [41] < ICl. [42] Secondly, with the exception of H 2 O ¥¥¥ ICl, the order of the potential energy barrier V(f e ) À V(f 0) follows the order of the binding strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order E F 2`E Cl 2`E Br 2`E BrCl`EClF is reasonable in view of the order of the electric quadrupole moments [69,70] of 2.76 Â 10 À40 C m 2 , 10.79(54) Â 10 À40 C m 2 , and 17.52 Â 10 À40 C m 2 for F 2 , Cl 2 , and Br 2 , respectively, and the fact that BrCl and ClF have small electric dipole moments of similar magnitude. [71,72] 3.3. Systematic Behavior among Angular Geometries of B´´´XY…”
Section: Systematic Behavior Among Intermolecularmentioning
confidence: 99%