1970
DOI: 10.3329/ptcb.v17i1.1123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Characterization of 28 Mango Germplasm Using RAPD

Abstract: Genetic variation and relationship among 28 mango germplasm were analyzed using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Out of 20 primers screened, four were selected, which gave 50 clear and bright fragments, out of which 48 fragments were considered polymorphic. The proportion of polymorphic loci and gene diversity values across all loci were 96% and 0.29, respectively. The UPGMA dendrogram based on genetic distance segregated the 28 mango germplasm into two main clusters. Sukul alone formed one cluster and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fifteen primers generated 177 bands with sizes ranged from 100 -5000 bp (Table 1). This was comparable with the results ranging from 200 bp to 3000 bp (Kumar et al, 2001), 190 bp to 2400 bp (Karihaloo et al, 2003), 105 bp to 1500 bp (Rahman et al, 2007), 250 bp to 2500 bp (Anuj et al, 2007), 240 bp to 2100 bp (Ahmad et al, 2008), 300 bp to 3500 bp (Bajpai et al, 2008), 100 bp to 3000bp (Das et al, 2010) and 70 bp to 4749 bp (Gajera et al, 2011) in mango.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The fifteen primers generated 177 bands with sizes ranged from 100 -5000 bp (Table 1). This was comparable with the results ranging from 200 bp to 3000 bp (Kumar et al, 2001), 190 bp to 2400 bp (Karihaloo et al, 2003), 105 bp to 1500 bp (Rahman et al, 2007), 250 bp to 2500 bp (Anuj et al, 2007), 240 bp to 2100 bp (Ahmad et al, 2008), 300 bp to 3500 bp (Bajpai et al, 2008), 100 bp to 3000bp (Das et al, 2010) and 70 bp to 4749 bp (Gajera et al, 2011) in mango.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Relatively higher number of alleles (Na) detected in the present study in comparison to the earlier reports may be attributed to relatively large and diverse accessions used. Different levels of polymorphism ranging from 73 to 100 % using markers like RAPD (Ravishankar et al (2000); Karihaloo et al (2003); Rahman et al (2007); Rajwana et al (2008); Souza et al (2011), ISSR polymorphism ranging from 85 to 97 % (Pandit et al (2007); Samal et al (2012); Tomar et al (2011) AFLP ranging from 84 to 96 % (Yamanaka et al (2006); Gálvez-López et al (2010) and 73 % of polymorphism by SCoT markers (Luo et al 2010) have been reported in earlier studies involving mango.…”
Section: Ssr Diversitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Molecular markers on the other hand have proved their potentiality in unraveling the limitations of morphological traits. In recent years, extensive molecular work has been carried out to estimate the genetic variation in mango germplasm using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers (Schnell et al 1995;Lopez et al 1997;Ravishankar et al 2000;Hemant Kumar et al 2001;Karihaloo et al 2003;Rahman et al 2007;Rajwana et al 2008;Díaz-Matallana et al 2009;Souza et al 2011;Ramessur and Ranghoo 2011) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (Eiadthong et al 1999); amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers (Eiadthong et al 2000;Kashkush et al 2001;Yamanaka et al 2006;Gálvez-López et al 2010) inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers (He et al 2005;Pandit et al 2007;Srivastava et al 2007;Tomar et al 2011;Rocha et al 2012;Samal et al 2012) and start codon targeted (SCoT) markers (Luo et al 2010). Among the molecular markers simple sequence repeat or (microsatellites) have been found to be the marker of choice for more precisely understanding the genetic diversity, gene mapping, and cultivar discrimination due to their abundance, co-dominant and high reproducibility nature (Gupta and Varshney 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of heterozygosity in our study was attributed to cross pollination and out crossing. Different levels of genetic diversity and polymorphism have been reported in mango using various types of markers, like 90% and above by SSR markers (Dillon et al, 2013;Surapaneni et al, 2013), 85 to 99% with ISSR (Ariffin et al, 2015;Samal et al, 2012;Tomar et al, 2011), 73 to 100% with RAPD (Ravishankar et al, 2000;Karihaloo et al, 2003;Rahman et al, 2007;Rajwana et al, 2008;Souza et al, 2011), 84 to 96% by AFLP (Yamanaka et al, 2006;Ga´lvez-Lo´pez et al, 2010) and 73% by SCoT markers (Luo et al, 2010). The average PIC value obtained in this study was 0.764 which was higher than the average value reported by earlier studies (Surapaneni et al, 2013;Dillon et al, 2013;Ravishankar et al, 2011;Hirano et al, 2010 andSchnell et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%