2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular characterization of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes included in Bulgarian collection by ISSR and AFLP™ analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
4
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
32
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pair-wise similarities ranged from 0.47 (SA-34 vs. PI-Agro-07) to 0.84 (SA-19 vs. SA-21). An average similarity coefficient of 0.65 was found, which was higher than the average similarity coefficient (0.52) of Kumar et al (2008), but lower than the average similarity coefficient (0.91) reported by Svetleva et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pair-wise similarities ranged from 0.47 (SA-34 vs. PI-Agro-07) to 0.84 (SA-19 vs. SA-21). An average similarity coefficient of 0.65 was found, which was higher than the average similarity coefficient (0.52) of Kumar et al (2008), but lower than the average similarity coefficient (0.91) reported by Svetleva et al (2006).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…The average PIC i value for the amplification products, across eight primer pairs, was 0.2065. Kumar et al (2008) and Svetleva et al (2006) used the AFLP technique, each with different primer pairs, to analyze the genetic diversity of common bean varieties and landraces collected at different locations, and found an average similarity coefficient of 0.52 and 0.91, Genetic diversity in NaN 3 -induced common bean mutants and commercial varieties detected by AFLP respectively. However, only very limited AFLP data are available for evaluating the genetic diversity in crop mutants (Lu et al 2007, Rashid et al 2009) obtained by induced mutation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides being as low-cost as RAPD, ISSR markers are highly recommended due to its great reproducibility and ease to be applied in genetic improvement programs (WEISING et al, 2005). Even with a considerably lower number of amplified fragments, the ISSR primers accessed a greater proportion of polymorphic characters than AFLP, as previously reported for common bean (SVETLEVA et al, 2006). However, the opposite situation generally occurs, as reported for Tribulus terrestris L. (SARWAT; DAS; SRIVASTAVA, 2008).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Once DNA has beens isolated, it can be analyzed either by fragmentation by enzymes, involving restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP -Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism), or by amplification (PCR-based techniques) and DNA sequencing. For example, in studies using Phaseolus, based on the use of Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA -RAPD (Nienhuis et al, 1995;Fofana et al, 1997), Inter-Simple Sequence Repeats -ISSR, Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism -AFLP (Svetleva et al, 2006), diversity is calculated not only according to geographical origin and botanical status, but also depending on the cultivated group. Based on the organization of genetic diversity observed in P. lunatus, Fofana et al (1997) offer a hypothesis on the process of domestication of this species.…”
Section: Dna Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%