2004
DOI: 10.1128/aem.70.3.1347-1355.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular Detection and Identification ofBrettanomyces/Dekkera bruxellensisandBrettanomyces/Dekkera anomalusin Spoiled Wines

Abstract: In this paper we describe the development of a PCR protocol to specifically detect Brettanomyces bruxellensis and B. anomalus. Primers DB90F and DB394R, targeting the D1-D2 loop of the 26S rRNA gene, were able to produce amplicons only when the DNA from these two species were used. No amplification product was obtained when DNA from other Brettanomyces spp. or wine yeasts were used as the templates. The 305-bp product was subjected to restriction enzyme analysis with DdeI to differentiate between B. bruxellens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The genus Dekkera was introduced to the taxonomy in 1964 after the production of ascospores (sporulating-form) was observed (Van der Walt, 1984). Currently, the five species jointly belonging to the genera Brettanomyces and Dekkera are: Brettanomyces custersianus, Brettanomyces naardenensis, Brettanomyces nanus, B. anomalus and B. bruxellensis (Kurtzman & Fell, 2000;Cocolin et al, 2004). Teleomorphs (perfect state) are known for the last two species, Dekkera anomala and Dekkera bruxellensis, respectively (Kurtzman & Fell, 2000).…”
Section: Different Species In Winementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genus Dekkera was introduced to the taxonomy in 1964 after the production of ascospores (sporulating-form) was observed (Van der Walt, 1984). Currently, the five species jointly belonging to the genera Brettanomyces and Dekkera are: Brettanomyces custersianus, Brettanomyces naardenensis, Brettanomyces nanus, B. anomalus and B. bruxellensis (Kurtzman & Fell, 2000;Cocolin et al, 2004). Teleomorphs (perfect state) are known for the last two species, Dekkera anomala and Dekkera bruxellensis, respectively (Kurtzman & Fell, 2000).…”
Section: Different Species In Winementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details regarding the morphological, biochemical and physiological characteristics of these species are well described in recent classification manuals (Barnett et al, 2000;Boekhout et al, 2002;Kurtzman & Fell, 2000). From the five species currently known, the species primarily associated with winemaking is B. bruxellensis (D. bruxellensis) (Egli & HenickKling, 2001;Stender et al, 2001;Cocolin et al, 2004), although B. anomalus (D. anomala) and B. custersianus isolations from must fermentations have been reported in two instances (Querol et al, 1990;Esteve-Zarzoso et al, 2001). With advances in DNAbased methods, recent wine-related investigations often include D. anomala along with the predominant species D. bruxellensis as conventional methods had showed difficulty in differentiating between these two species .…”
Section: Different Species In Winementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from isolations from beer and wine, Brettanomyces species have been detected and isolated in other foods, such as cider, soft drinks, dairy products, and olives (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). Despite its economic importance either as a spoilage contaminant in wine and nonalcoholic beverages or as a vital component of the fermentation biota in the production of certain beers, the physiology and ecology of Brettanomyces yeasts have only recently been the subject of intensive research (1,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). However, little is still known about the level of genomic interstrain variation within B. bruxellensis or within the genus Brettanomyces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, most genetic studies on Brettanomyces have focused on rapid fingerprinting using rRNA sequencing (26,27), PCRrestriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (28), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis (29), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), and microsatellite fingerprinting (25,30). However, so far these studies have mostly been performed with strains belonging to the same species, most often B. bruxellensis (17,20,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brettanomyces/Dekkera yeasts exist in two forms: Brettanomyces, the asexual, non-sporulating form, and Dekkera, the sexual, sporulating form. These genera are particularly known as spoiling agents in beer, wine, cider and soft drinks industries (Deak and Beuchat, 1996 (Cocolin et al 2004;Oelofse et al, 2008). Different strains of Brettanomyces can show great differences in their production of volatile phenols (Joseph and Bisson, 2004).…”
Section: The Production Of Volatile Phenols By Brettanomyces/dekkeramentioning
confidence: 99%