2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular detection of tick-borne bacterial agents in Brazilian and exotic captive carnivores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Melo et al (2011), studying this same dogs, reported greater frequency of seropositive dogs as they become older, probably due to a higher chance of becoming infested with ticks over time. Despite the recent reports of ehrlichial agents other than E. canis in Brazil (MACHADO et al, 2006;SILVEIRA et al, 2012;ANDRÉ et al, 2010ANDRÉ et al, , 2012SACCHI et al, 2012), molecular detection of new genotypic variants in Brazilian wildlife animals has been reported, since those animals play the role of sentinels for vector-borne pathogens because they can act as hosts for both bacteria and arthropod, including wildlife of the Pantanal region (WIDMER et al, 2011). However, the present work failed to detect Ehrlichia species different from E. canis infecting dogs from northern Pantanal, even though we used a high sensitive PCR capable of detecting all known Ehrlichia species .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Melo et al (2011), studying this same dogs, reported greater frequency of seropositive dogs as they become older, probably due to a higher chance of becoming infested with ticks over time. Despite the recent reports of ehrlichial agents other than E. canis in Brazil (MACHADO et al, 2006;SILVEIRA et al, 2012;ANDRÉ et al, 2010ANDRÉ et al, , 2012SACCHI et al, 2012), molecular detection of new genotypic variants in Brazilian wildlife animals has been reported, since those animals play the role of sentinels for vector-borne pathogens because they can act as hosts for both bacteria and arthropod, including wildlife of the Pantanal region (WIDMER et al, 2011). However, the present work failed to detect Ehrlichia species different from E. canis infecting dogs from northern Pantanal, even though we used a high sensitive PCR capable of detecting all known Ehrlichia species .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…André et al (30) detected positivity of 21% in Ehrlichia spp. in wild captive felids in Brazil, among which 52% contained ehrlichial DNA closely related to E. chaffeensis, a species associated to human monocytic ehrlichiosis (31) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Wild animals play an important role in carrying vectors that may potentially transmit pathogens (EBANI et al, 2008). Several reports highlighted the participation of wild mammals, such as deer, foxes, rodents, and carnivores in A. phagocytophilum cycles, including their role as hosts of these bacteria (LIZ et al, 2000;FUENTE et al, 2008;VERONESI et al, 2011;ANDRÉ et al, 2012, JAHFARI et al, 2014. Wild and domestic animals may share pathogens, as described by Zhan et al (2010), who found goats, sheep, and wild rodents in the same area infected by the same strain of A. phagocytophilum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%